Skip to main content
Mathematics LibreTexts

4.7: Extensions of Cauchy's theorem

  • Page ID
    50602
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    Cauchy’s theorem requires that the function \(f(z)\) be analytic on a simply connected region. In cases where it is not, we can extend it in a useful way.

    Suppose \(R\) is the region between the two simple closed curves \(C_1\) and \(C_2\). Note, both \(C_1\) and \(C_2\) are oriented in a counterclockwise direction.

    001.svg Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\): (CC BY-NC; Ümit Kaya)

    Theorem \(\PageIndex{1}\) Extended Cauchy's theorem

    If \(f(z)\) is analytic on \(R\) then

    \[\int_{C_1 - C_2} f(z)\ dz = 0. \nonumber \]

    Proof

    The proof is based on the following figure. We ‘cut’ both \(C_1\) and \(C_2\) and connect them by two copies of \(C_3\), one in each direction. (In the figure we have drawn the two copies of \(C_3\) as separate curves, in reality they are the same curve traversed in opposite directions.)

    0.svg

    With \(C_3\) acting as a cut, the region enclosed by \(C_1 + C_3 - C_2 - C_3\) is simply connected, so Cauchy's Theorem 4.6.1 applies. We get

    \[\int_{C_1 + C_3 - C_2 - C_3} f(z) \ dz = 0 \nonumber \]

    The contributions of \(C_3\) and \(-C_3\) cancel, which leaves \(\int_{C_1 - C_2} f(z)\ dz = 0.\) QED

    Note

    This clearly implies \(\int_{C_1} f(z)\ dz = \int_{C_2} f(z) \ dz\).

    Example \(\PageIndex{1}\)

    Let \(f(z) = 1/z\). \(f(z)\) is defined and analytic on the punctured plane. What values can \(\int_C f(z)\ dz\) take for \(C\) a simple closed curve (positively oriented) in the plane?

    002.svg
    Punctured plane: \(C\) - {0} (CC BY-NC; Ümit Kaya)
    Solution

    We have two cases (i) \(C_1\) not around 0, and (ii) \(C_2\) around 0

    003.svg

    Case (i): Cauchy’s theorem applies directly because the interior does not contain the problem point at the origin. Thus,

    \[\int_{C_1} f(z)\ dz = 0. \nonumber \]

    Case (ii): we will show that

    \[\int_{C_2} f(z)\ dz = 2\pi i. \nonumber \]

    Let \(C_3\) be a small circle of radius \(a\) centered at 0 and entirely inside \(C_2\).

    004.svg
    Figure for part (ii) (CC BY-NC; Ümit Kaya)

    By the extended Cauchy theorem we have

    \[\int_{C_2} f(z)\ dz = \int_{C_3} f(z)\ dz = \int_{0}^{2\pi} i \ dt = 2\pi i. \nonumber \]

    Here, the lline integral for \(C_3\) was computed directly using the usual parametrization of a circle.

    Answer to the question

    The only possible values are 0 and \(2 \pi i\).

    We can extend this answer in the following way:

    If \(C\) is not simple, then the possible values of

    \[\int_C f(z)\ dz \nonumber \]

    are \(2\pi n i\), where \(n\) is the number of times \(C\) goes (counterclockwise) around the origin 0.

    Definition: Winding Number

    \(n\) is called the winding number of \(C\) around 0. \(n\) also equals the number of times \(C\) crosses the positive \(x\)-axis, counting \(\pm 1\) for crossing from below and -1 for crossing from above.

    005.svg
    A curve with winding number 2 around the origin. (CC BY-NC; Ümit Kaya)

    Example \(\PageIndex{2}\)

    A further extension: using the same trick of cutting the region by curves to make it simply connected we can show that if \(f\) is analytic in the region \(R\) shown below then

    \[\int_{C_1 - C_2 - C_3 - C_4} f(z)\ dz = 0. \nonumber \]

    006.svg

    That is, \(C_1 - C_2 - C_3 - C_4\) is the boundary of the region \(R\).

    Orientation

    It is important to get the orientation of the curves correct. One way to do this is to make sure that the region \(R\) is always to the left as you traverse the curve. In the above example. The region is to the right as you traverse \(C_2, C_3\) or \(C_4\) in the direction indicated. This is why we put a minus sign on each when describing the boundary.


    This page titled 4.7: Extensions of Cauchy's theorem is shared under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Jeremy Orloff (MIT OpenCourseWare) via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform; a detailed edit history is available upon request.