18.2: Voting Theory
- Page ID
- 34290
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)
\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)
\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\(\newcommand{\longvect}{\overrightarrow}\)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\(\newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left| #1 \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\left< #1 \right|}\)
\(\newcommand{\braket}[2]{\left< #1 \vphantom{#2} \right| \left. #2 \vphantom{#1} \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\braopket}[3]{\left< #1 \vphantom{#2}\vphantom{#3} \right| #2 \vphantom{#1}\vphantom{#3} \left| #3 \vphantom{#1}\vphantom{#2} \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\qmvec}[1]{\mathbf{\vec{#1}}}\)
\(\newcommand{\op}[1]{\hat{\mathbf{#1}}}\)
\(\newcommand{\expect}[1]{\langle #1 \rangle}\)
\(\newcommand{\dfn}[1]{\emph{\textbf{#1}}}\)
1.
\(\begin{array}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|}
\hline \text { Number of voters } & 3 & 3 & 1 & 3 & 2 \\
\hline 1^{\text {st }} \text { choice } & \mathrm{A} & \mathrm{A} & \mathrm{B} & \mathrm{B} & \mathrm{C} \\
\hline 2^{\text {nd }} \text { choice } & \mathrm{B} & \mathrm{C} & \mathrm{A} & \mathrm{C} & \mathrm{A} \\
\hline 3^{\text {rd }} \text { choice } & \mathrm{C} & \mathrm{B} & \mathrm{C} & \mathrm{A} & \mathrm{B} \\
\hline
\end{array}\)
3.
- \(9+19+11+8 = 47\)
- 24 for majority; 16 for plurality (though a choice would need a minimum of 17 votes to actually win under the Plurality method)
- Atlanta, with 19 first-choice votes
- Atlanta 94, Buffalo 111, Chicago 77. Winner: Buffalo
- Chicago eliminated, 11 votes go to Buffalo. Winner: Buffalo
- A vs B: B. A vs C: A. B vs C: B. B gets 2 pts, A 1 pt. Buffalo wins.
5.
- \(120+50+40+90+60+100 = 460\)
- 231 for majority; 116 for plurality
- A with 150 first choice votes
- A 1140, B 1060, C 1160, D 1240. Winner: D
- B eliminated, votes to C. D eliminated, votes to A. Winner: A
- A vs B: B. A vs C: A. A vs D: D. B vs C: C. B vs D: D. C vs D: C. A 1pt, B 1pt, C 2pt, D 2pt. Tie between C and D.
Winner would probably be C since C was preferred over D
7.
- 33
- 17
9. Yes, B
11. B, with 17 approvals
13. Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion
15. Condorcet Criterion


