Skip to main content
$$\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}$$ $$\newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}$$ $$\newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}$$ $$\newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}$$ $$\newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}$$ $$\newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}$$ $$\newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}$$ $$\newcommand{\norm}{\| #1 \|}$$ $$\newcommand{\inner}{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}$$ $$\newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}$$

# 8.7: Constant Coefficient Equations with Impulses

• • Contributed by William F. Trench
• Andrew G. Cowles Distinguished Professor Emeritus (Mathamatics) at Trinity University

$$\newcommand{\vecs}{\overset { \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} }$$

$$\newcommand{\vecd}{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}}$$

So far in this chapter, we’ve considered initial value problems for the constant coefficient equation

$ay''+by'+cy=f(t),$

where $$f$$ is continuous or piecewise continuous on $$[0,\infty)$$. In this section we consider initial value problems where $$f$$ represents a force that’s very large for a short time and zero otherwise. We say that such forces are impulsive. Impulsive forces occur, for example, when two objects collide. Since it isn’t feasible to represent such forces as continuous or piecewise continuous functions, we must construct a different mathematical model to deal with them.

If $$f$$ is an integrable function and $$f(t)=0$$ for $$t$$ outside of the interval $$[t_0,t_0+h]$$, then $$\int_{t_0}^{t_0+h} f(t)\,dt$$ is called the total impulse of $$f$$. We’re interested in the idealized situation where $$h$$ is so small that the total impulse can be assumed to be applied instantaneously at $$t=t_0$$. We say in this case that $$f$$ is an impulse function. In particular, we denote by $$\delta(t-t_0)$$ the impulse function with total impulse equal to one, applied at $$t=t_0$$. (The impulse function $$\delta(t)$$ obtained by setting $$t_0=0$$ is the Dirac $$\delta$$ function.) It must be understood, however, that $$\delta(t-t_0)$$ isn’t a function in the standard sense, since our “definition” implies that $$\delta(t-t_0)=0$$ if $$t\ne t_0$$, while

$\int_{t_0}^{t_0} \delta(t-t_0)\,dt=1.$

From calculus we know that no function can have these properties; nevertheless, there’s a branch of mathematics known as the theory of distributions where the definition can be made rigorous. Since the theory of distributions is beyond the scope of this book, we’ll take an intuitive approach to impulse functions.

Our first task is to define what we mean by the solution of the initial value problem

$ay''+by'+cy=\delta(t-t_0), \quad y(0)=0,\quad y'(0)=0,$

where $$t_0$$ is a fixed nonnegative number. The next theorem will motivate our definition.

Theorem $$\PageIndex{1}$$

[thmtype:8.7.1] Suppose $$t_0\ge0.$$ For each positive number $$h,$$ let $$y_h$$ be the solution of the initial value problem

$\label{eq:8.7.1} ay_h''+by_h'+cy_h=f_h(t), \quad y_h(0)=0,\quad y_h'(0)=0,$

where

$\label{eq:8.7.2} f_h(t)=\left\{\begin{array}{cl} 0,&0\le t<t_0,\\[4pt] 1/h,&t_0\le t< t_0+h,\\[4pt] 0,&t\ge t_0+h,\end{array}\right.$

so $$f_h$$ has unit total impulse equal to the area of the shaded rectangle in Figure $$\ref{figure:8.7.1}$$. Then

$\label{eq:8.7.3} \lim_{h\to0+}y_h(t)=u(t-t_0)w(t-t_0),$

where

$w={\cal L}^{-1}\left(1\over as^2+bs+c\right).$ $$y=f_h(t)$$

Taking Laplace transforms in Equation \ref{eq:8.7.1} yields

$(as^2+bs+c)Y_h(s)=F_h(s),$

so

$Y_h(s)={F_h(s)\over as^2+bs+c}.$

The convolution theorem implies that

$y_h(t)=\int_0^t w(t-\tau)f_h(\tau)\,d\tau.$

Therefore, Equation \ref{eq:8.7.2} implies that

$\label{eq:8.7.4} y_h(t)=\left\{\begin{array}{cl} 0,&0\le t<t_0,\\[4pt] \{{1\over h}\int_{t_0}^tw(t-\tau)\,d\tau},&t_0\le t\le t_0+h,\\[4pt] \{{1\over h }\int_{t_0}^{t_0+h}w(t-\tau)\,d\tau},&t>t_0+h.\end{array}\right.$

Since $$y_h(t)=0$$ for all $$h$$ if $$0\le t\le t_0$$, it follows that

$\label{eq:8.7.5} \lim_{h\to0+}y_h(t)=0\mbox{\quad if \quad}0\le t\le t_0.$

We’ll now show that

$\label{eq:8.7.6} \lim_{h\to0+}y_h(t)=w(t-t_0)\mbox{\quad if \quad}t>t_0.$

Suppose $$t$$ is fixed and $$t>t_0$$. From Equation \ref{eq:8.7.4},

$\label{eq:8.7.7} y_h(t)={1\over h}\int_{t_0}^{t_0+h}w(t-\tau)d\tau\mbox{\quad if \quad} h<t-t_0.$

Since

$\label{eq:8.7.8} {1\over h}\int_{t_0}^{t_0+h}d\tau=1,$

we can write

$w(t-t_0)={1\over h}w(t-t_0)\int_{t_0}^{t_0+h}\,d\tau= {1\over h}\int_{t_0}^{t_0+h}w(t-t_0)\,d\tau.$

From this and Equation \ref{eq:8.7.7},

$y_h(t)-w(t-t_0)= {1\over h}\int_{t_0}^{t_0+h}\left(w(t-\tau)-w(t-t_0)\right)\,d\tau.$

Therefore

$\label{eq:8.7.9} |y_h(t)-w(t-t_0)|\le {1\over h}\int_{t_0}^{t_0+h}|w(t-\tau)-w(t-t_0)|\,d\tau.$

Now let $$M_h$$ be the maximum value of $$|w(t-\tau)-w(t-t_0)|$$ as $$\tau$$ varies over the interval $$[t_0,t_0+h]$$. (Remember that $$t$$ and $$t_0$$ are fixed.) Then Equation \ref{eq:8.7.8} and Equation \ref{eq:8.7.9} imply that

$\label{eq:8.7.10} |y_h(t)-w(t-t_0)|\le {1\over h}M_h\int_{t_0}^{t_0+h}\,d\tau=M_h.$

But $$\lim_{h\to0+}M_h=0$$, since $$w$$ is continuous. Therefore Equation \ref{eq:8.7.10} implies Equation \ref{eq:8.7.6}. This and Equation \ref{eq:8.7.5} imply Equation \ref{eq:8.7.3}.

Theorem [thmtype:8.7.1} motivates the next definition.

Theorem $$\PageIndex{2}$$

If $$t_0>0$$, then the solution of the initial value problem

$\label{eq:8.7.11} ay''+by'+cy=\delta(t-t_0), \quad y(0)=0,\quad y'(0)=0,$

is defined to be

$y=u(t-t_0)w(t-t_0),$

where

$w={\cal L}^{-1}\left(1\over as^2+bs+c\right).$

In physical applications where the input $$f$$ and the output $$y$$ of a device are related by the differential equation

$ay''+by'+cy=f(t),$

$$w$$ is called the impulse response of the device. Note that $$w$$ is the solution of the initial value problem

$\label{eq:8.7.12} aw''+bw'+cw=0, \quad w(0)=0,\quad w'(0)=1/a,$

as can be seen by using the Laplace transform to solve this problem. (Verify.) On the other hand, we can solve Equation \ref{eq:8.7.12} by the methods of Section 5.2 and show that $$w$$ is defined on $$(-\infty,\infty)$$ by

$\label{eq:8.7.13} w={e^{r_2t}-e^{r_1t}\over a(r_2-r_1)},\quad w={1\over a}te^{r_1t}, \mbox{\quad or \quad} w={1\over a\omega}e^{\lambda t}\sin\omega t,$

depending upon whether the polynomial $$p(r)=ar^2+br+c$$ has distinct real zeros $$r_1$$ and $$r_2$$, a repeated zero $$r_1$$, or complex conjugate zeros $$\lambda\pm i\omega$$. (In most physical applications, the zeros of the characteristic polynomial have negative real parts, so $$\lim_{t\to\infty}w(t)=0$$.) This means that $$y=u(t-t_0)w(t-t_0)$$ is defined on $$(-\infty,\infty)$$ and has the following properties:

$y(t)=0,\quad t<t_0,$

$ay''+by'+cy=0\mbox{\quad on \quad } (-\infty,t_0)\mbox{\quad and \quad}(t_0,\infty),$

and

$\label{eq:8.7.14} y'_-(t_0)=0, \quad y'_+(t_0)=1/a$

(remember that $$y'_-(t_0)$$ and $$y'_+(t_0)$$ are derivatives from the right and left, respectively) and $$y'(t_0)$$ does not exist. Thus, even though we defined $$y=u(t-t_0)w(t-t_0)$$ to be the solution of Equation \ref{eq:8.7.11}, this function doesn’t satisfy the differential equation in Equation \ref{eq:8.7.11} at $$t_0$$, since it isn’t differentiable there; in fact Equation \ref{eq:8.7.14} indicates that an impulse causes a jump discontinuity in velocity. (To see that this is reasonable, think of what happens when you hit a ball with a bat.) This means that the initial value problem Equation \ref{eq:8.7.11} doesn’t make sense if $$t_0=0$$, since $$y'(0)$$ doesn’t exist in this case. However $$y=u(t)w(t)$$ can be defined to be the solution of the modified initial value problem

$ay''+by'+cy=\delta(t), \quad y(0)=0,\quad y'_-(0)=0,$

where the condition on the derivative at $$t=0$$ has been replaced by a condition on the derivative from the left.

Figure [figure:8.7.2} illustrates Theorem [thmtype:8.7.1} for the case where the impulse response $$w$$ is the first expression in Equation \ref{eq:8.7.13} and $$r_1$$ and $$r_2$$ are distinct and both negative. The solid curve in the figure is the graph of $$w$$. The dashed curves are solutions of Equation \ref{eq:8.7.1} for various values of $$h$$. As $$h$$ decreases the graph of $$y_h$$ moves to the left toward the graph of $$w$$. An illustration of Theorem [thmtype:8.7.1}

Example $$\PageIndex{1}$$:

Find the solution of the initial value problem

$\label{eq:8.7.15} y''-2y'+y=\delta(t-t_0), \quad y(0)=0,\quad y'(0)=0,$

where $$t_0>0$$. Then interpret the solution for the case where $$t_0=0$$.

Solution

Here

$w={\cal L}^{-1}\left(1\over s^2-2s+1\right)={\cal L}^{-1}\left( 1\over(s-1)^2\right)=te^{-t},$

so Definition [thmtype:8.7.2} yields

$y=u(t-t_0)(t-t_0)e^{-(t-t_0)}$

as the solution of Equation \ref{eq:8.7.15} if $$t_0>0$$. If $$t_0=0$$, then Equation \ref{eq:8.7.15} doesn’t have a solution; however, $$y=u(t)te^{-t}$$ (which we would usually write simply as $$y=te^{-t}$$) is the solution of the modified initial value problem

$y''-2y'+y=\delta(t), \quad y(0)=0,\quad y_-'(0)=0.$

The graph of $$y=u(t-t_0)(t-t_0)e^{-(t-t_0)}$$ is shown in Figure [figure:8.7.3} $$y=u(t-t_0)(t-t_0)e^{-(t-t_0)}$$

Definition

The ideal gas law is easy to remember and apply in solving problems, as long as you get the proper values a

Definition [thmtype:8.7.2} and the principle of superposition motivate the next definition.

[thmtype:8.7.3] Suppose $$\alpha$$ is a nonzero constant and $$f$$ is piecewise continuous on $$[0,\infty)$$. If $$t_0>0$$, then the solution of the initial value problem

$ay''+by'+cy=f(t)+\alpha\delta(t-t_0), \quad y(0)=k_0,\quad y'(0)=k_1$

is defined to be

$y(t)=\hat y(t)+\alpha u(t-t_0)w(t-t_0),$

where $$\hat y$$ is the solution of

$ay''+by'+cy=f(t), \quad y(0)=k_0,\quad y'(0)=k_1.$

This definition also applies if $$t_0=0$$, provided that the initial condition $$y'(0)=k_1$$ is replaced by $$y_-'(0)=k_1$$.

Example $$\PageIndex{2}$$

Solve the initial value problem

$\label{eq:8.7.16} y''+6y'+5y=3e^{-2t}+2\delta(t-1),\quad y(0)=-3,\quad y'(0)=2.$

Solution

We leave it to you to show that the solution of

$y''+6y'+5y=3e^{-2t}, \quad y(0)=-3,\; y'(0)=2$

is

$\hat y=-e^{-2t}+{1\over2}e^{-5t}-{5\over2}e^{-t}.$

Since

$\begin{array}{ccccl} w(t)&=&{\cal L}^{-1}\left(\{1\over s^2+6s+5}\right)&=& {\cal L}^{-1}\left(\{1\over(s+1)(s+5)}\right)\\[4pt] &=&\{{1\over4}{\cal L}^{-1}\left({1\over s+1}-{1\over s+5}\right)} &=&\{e^{-t}-e^{-5t}\over4}, \end{array}$

the solution of Equation \ref{eq:8.7.16} is

$\label{eq:8.7.17} y=-e^{-2t}+{1\over2}e^{-5t}-{5\over2}e^{-t} +u(t-1){e^{-(t-1)}-e^{-5(t-1)}\over2}$

(Figure [figure:8.7.4}).

Definition [thmtype:8.7.3} can be extended in the obvious way to cover the case where the forcing function contains more than one impulse.

Example $$\PageIndex{3}$$

Solve the initial value problem

$\label{eq:8.7.18} y''+y=1+2\delta(t-\pi)-3\delta(t-2\pi), \quad y(0)=-1,\; y'(0)=2.$

Solution

We leave it to you to show that

$\hat y= 1-2\cos t+2\sin t$

is the solution of

$y''+y=1, \quad y(0)=-1,\quad y'(0)=2.$

Since

$w={\cal L}^{-1}\left(1\over s^2+1\right)=\sin t,$

the solution of Equation \ref{eq:8.7.18} is

\begin{aligned} y&=&1-2\cos t+2\sin t+2u(t-\pi)\sin(t-\pi)-3u(t-2\pi)\sin(t-2\pi)\\ &=&1-2\cos t+2\sin t-2u(t-\pi)\sin t-3u(t-2\pi)\sin t,\end{aligned}

or

$\label{eq:8.7.19} y=\left\{\begin{array}{cl} 1-2\cos t+2\sin t,&0\le t<\pi,\\[4pt] 1-2\cos t,&\pi\le t<2\pi,\\[4pt] 1-2\cos t-3\sin t,&t\ge 2\pi\end{array}\right.$

(Figure [figure:8.7.5}).