10.7E: Outliers (Exercises)
Use the following information to answer the next four exercises. The scatter plot shows the relationship between hours spent studying and exam scores. The line shown is the calculated line of best fit. The correlation coefficient is \(0.69\).
Do there appear to be any outliers?
Answer
Yes, there appears to be an outlier at \((6, 58)\).
A point is removed, and the line of best fit is recalculated. The new correlation coefficient is 0.98. Does the point appear to have been an outlier? Why?
What effect did the potential outlier have on the line of best fit?
Answer
The potential outlier flattened the slope of the line of best fit because it was below the data set. It made the line of best fit less accurate as a predictor for the data.
Are you more or less confident in the predictive ability of the new line of best fit?
The Sum of Squared Errors for a data set of 18 numbers is 49. What is the standard deviation?
Answer
\(s = 1.75\)
The Standard Deviation for the Sum of Squared Errors for a data set is 9.8. What is the cutoff for the vertical distance that a point can be from the line of best fit to be considered an outlier?
Bring It Together
The average number of people in a family that received welfare for various years is given in Table.
| Year | Welfare family size |
|---|---|
| 1969 | 4.0 |
| 1973 | 3.6 |
| 1975 | 3.2 |
| 1979 | 3.0 |
| 1983 | 3.0 |
| 1988 | 3.0 |
| 1991 | 2.9 |
- Using “year” as the independent variable and “welfare family size” as the dependent variable, draw a scatter plot of the data.
- Calculate the least-squares line. Put the equation in the form of: \(\hat{y} = a + bx\)
- Find the correlation coefficient. Is it significant?
- Pick two years between 1969 and 1991 and find the estimated welfare family sizes.
- Based on the data in Table, is there a linear relationship between the year and the average number of people in a welfare family?
- Using the least-squares line, estimate the welfare family sizes for 1960 and 1995. Does the least-squares line give an accurate estimate for those years? Explain why or why not.
- Are there any outliers in the data?
- What is the estimated average welfare family size for 1986? Does the least squares line give an accurate estimate for that year? Explain why or why not.
- What is the slope of the least squares (best-fit) line? Interpret the slope.
The percent of female wage and salary workers who are paid hourly rates is given in Table for the years 1979 to 1992.
| Year | Percent of workers paid hourly rates |
|---|---|
| 1979 | 61.2 |
| 1980 | 60.7 |
| 1981 | 61.3 |
| 1982 | 61.3 |
| 1983 | 61.8 |
| 1984 | 61.7 |
| 1985 | 61.8 |
| 1986 | 62.0 |
| 1987 | 62.7 |
| 1990 | 62.8 |
| 1992 | 62.9 |
- Using “year” as the independent variable and “percent” as the dependent variable, draw a scatter plot of the data.
- Does it appear from inspection that there is a relationship between the variables? Why or why not?
- Calculate the least-squares line. Put the equation in the form of: \(\hat{y} = a + bx\)
- Find the correlation coefficient. Is it significant?
- Find the estimated percents for 1991 and 1988.
- Based on the data, is there a linear relationship between the year and the percent of female wage and salary earners who are paid hourly rates?
- Are there any outliers in the data?
- What is the estimated percent for the year 2050? Does the least-squares line give an accurate estimate for that year? Explain why or why not.
- What is the slope of the least-squares (best-fit) line? Interpret the slope.
Answer
- Check student's solution.
- yes
- \(\hat{y} = -266.8863 + 0.1656x\)
- \(0.9448\); Yes
- \(62.8233; 62.3265\)
- yes
- yes; \((1987, 62.7)\)
- \(72.5937\); no
-
\(slope = 0.1656\).
As the year increases by one, the percent of workers paid hourly rates tends to increase by 0.1656.
Use the following information to answer the next two exercises. The cost of a leading liquid laundry detergent in different sizes is given in Table.
| Size (ounces) | Cost ($) | Cost per ounce |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | 3.99 | |
| 32 | 4.99 | |
| 64 | 5.99 | |
| 200 | 10.99 |
- Using “size” as the independent variable and “cost” as the dependent variable, draw a scatter plot.
- Does it appear from inspection that there is a relationship between the variables? Why or why not?
- Calculate the least-squares line. Put the equation in the form of: \(\hat{y} = a + bx\)
- Find the correlation coefficient. Is it significant?
- If the laundry detergent were sold in a 40-ounce size, find the estimated cost.
- If the laundry detergent were sold in a 90-ounce size, find the estimated cost.
- Does it appear that a line is the best way to fit the data? Why or why not?
- Are there any outliers in the given data?
- Is the least-squares line valid for predicting what a 300-ounce size of the laundry detergent would you cost? Why or why not?
- What is the slope of the least-squares (best-fit) line? Interpret the slope.
- Complete Table for the cost per ounce of the different sizes.
- Using “size” as the independent variable and “cost per ounce” as the dependent variable, draw a scatter plot of the data.
- Does it appear from inspection that there is a relationship between the variables? Why or why not?
- Calculate the least-squares line. Put the equation in the form of: \(\hat{y} = a + bx\)
- Find the correlation coefficient. Is it significant?
- If the laundry detergent were sold in a 40-ounce size, find the estimated cost per ounce.
- If the laundry detergent were sold in a 90-ounce size, find the estimated cost per ounce.
- Does it appear that a line is the best way to fit the data? Why or why not?
- Are there any outliers in the the data?
- Is the least-squares line valid for predicting what a 300-ounce size of the laundry detergent would cost per ounce? Why or why not?
- What is the slope of the least-squares (best-fit) line? Interpret the slope.
Answer
-
Size (ounces) Cost ($) cents/oz 16 3.99 24.94 32 4.99 15.59 64 5.99 9.36 200 10.99 5.50 - Check student’s solution.
- There is a linear relationship for the sizes 16 through 64, but that linear trend does not continue to the 200-oz size.
- \(\hat{y} = 20.2368 - 0.0819x\)
- \(r = -0.8086\)
- 40-oz: 16.96 cents/oz
- 90-oz: 12.87 cents/oz
- The relationship is not linear; the least squares line is not appropriate.
- no outliers
- No, you would be extrapolating. The 300-oz size is outside the range of \(x\).
- \(slope = -0.08194\); for each additional ounce in size, the cost per ounce decreases by 0.082 cents.
According to a flyer by a Prudential Insurance Company representative, the costs of approximate probate fees and taxes for selected net taxable estates are as follows:
| Net Taxable Estate ($) | Approximate Probate Fees and Taxes ($) |
|---|---|
| 600,000 | 30,000 |
| 750,000 | 92,500 |
| 1,000,000 | 203,000 |
| 1,500,000 | 438,000 |
| 2,000,000 | 688,000 |
| 2,500,000 | 1,037,000 |
| 3,000,000 | 1,350,000 |
- Decide which variable should be the independent variable and which should be the dependent variable.
- Draw a scatter plot of the data.
- Does it appear from inspection that there is a relationship between the variables? Why or why not?
- Calculate the least-squares line. Put the equation in the form of: \(\hat{y} = a + bx\).
- Find the correlation coefficient. Is it significant?
- Find the estimated total cost for a next taxable estate of $1,000,000. Find the cost for $2,500,000.
- Does it appear that a line is the best way to fit the data? Why or why not?
- Are there any outliers in the data?
- Based on these results, what would be the probate fees and taxes for an estate that does not have any assets?
- What is the slope of the least-squares (best-fit) line? Interpret the slope.
The following are advertised sale prices of color televisions at Anderson’s.
| Size (inches) | Sale Price ($) |
|---|---|
| 9 | 147 |
| 20 | 197 |
| 27 | 297 |
| 31 | 447 |
| 35 | 1177 |
| 40 | 2177 |
| 60 | 2497 |
- Decide which variable should be the independent variable and which should be the dependent variable.
- Draw a scatter plot of the data.
- Does it appear from inspection that there is a relationship between the variables? Why or why not?
- Calculate the least-squares line. Put the equation in the form of: \(\hat{y} = a + bx\).
- Find the correlation coefficient. Is it significant?
- Find the estimated sale price for a 32 inch television. Find the cost for a 50 inch television.
- Does it appear that a line is the best way to fit the data? Why or why not?
- Are there any outliers in the data?
- What is the slope of the least-squares (best-fit) line? Interpret the slope.
Answer
- Size is \(x\), the independent variable, price is \(y\), the dependent variable.
- Check student’s solution.
- The relationship does not appear to be linear.
- \(\hat{y} = -745.252 + 54.75569x\)
- \(r = 0.8944\), yes it is significant
- 32-inch: $1006.93, 50-inch: $1992.53
- No, the relationship does not appear to be linear. However, \(r\) is significant.
- yes, the 60-inch TV
- For each additional inch, the price increases by $54.76
Table shows the average heights for American boys in 1990.
| Age (years) | Height (cm) |
|---|---|
| birth | 50.8 |
| 2 | 83.8 |
| 3 | 91.4 |
| 5 | 106.6 |
| 7 | 119.3 |
| 10 | 137.1 |
| 14 | 157.5 |
- Decide which variable should be the independent variable and which should be the dependent variable.
- Draw a scatter plot of the data.
- Does it appear from inspection that there is a relationship between the variables? Why or why not?
- Calculate the least-squares line. Put the equation in the form of: \(\hat{y} = a + bx\).
- Find the correlation coefficient. Is it significant?
- Find the estimated average height for a one-year-old. Find the estimated average height for an eleven-year-old.
- Does it appear that a line is the best way to fit the data? Why or why not?
- Are there any outliers in the data?
- Use the least squares line to estimate the average height for a sixty-two-year-old man. Do you think that your answer is reasonable? Why or why not?
- What is the slope of the least-squares (best-fit) line? Interpret the slope.
| State | # letters in name | Year entered the Union | Ranks for entering the Union | Area (square miles) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 7 | 1819 | 22 | 52,423 |
| Colorado | 8 | 1876 | 38 | 104,100 |
| Hawaii | 6 | 1959 | 50 | 10,932 |
| Iowa | 4 | 1846 | 29 | 56,276 |
| Maryland | 8 | 1788 | 7 | 12,407 |
| Missouri | 8 | 1821 | 24 | 69,709 |
| New Jersey | 9 | 1787 | 3 | 8,722 |
| Ohio | 4 | 1803 | 17 | 44,828 |
| South Carolina | 13 | 1788 | 8 | 32,008 |
| Utah | 4 | 1896 | 45 | 84,904 |
| Wisconsin | 9 | 1848 | 30 | 65,499 |
We are interested in whether there is a relationship between the ranking of a state and the area of the state.
- What are the independent and dependent variables?
- What do you think the scatter plot will look like? Make a scatter plot of the data.
- Does it appear from inspection that there is a relationship between the variables? Why or why not?
- Calculate the least-squares line. Put the equation in the form of: \(\hat{y} = a + bx\).
- Find the correlation coefficient. What does it imply about the significance of the relationship?
- Find the estimated areas for Alabama and for Colorado. Are they close to the actual areas?
- Use the two points in part f to plot the least-squares line on your graph from part b.
- Does it appear that a line is the best way to fit the data? Why or why not?
- Are there any outliers?
- Use the least squares line to estimate the area of a new state that enters the Union. Can the least-squares line be used to predict it? Why or why not?
- Delete “Hawaii” and substitute “Alaska” for it. Alaska is the forty-ninth, state with an area of 656,424 square miles.
- Calculate the new least-squares line.
- Find the estimated area for Alabama. Is it closer to the actual area with this new least-squares line or with the previous one that included Hawaii? Why do you think that’s the case?
- Do you think that, in general, newer states are larger than the original states?
Answer
- Let rank be the independent variable and area be the dependent variable.
- Check student’s solution.
- There appears to be a linear relationship, with one outlier.
- \(\hat{y} \text{ (area) } = 24177.06 + 1010.478x\)
- \(r = 0.50047\), \(r\) is not significant so there is no relationship between the variables.
- Alabama: 46407.576 Colorado: 62575.224
- Alabama estimate is closer than Colorado estimate.
- If the outlier is removed, there is a linear relationship.
- There is one outlier (Hawaii).
- rank 51: 75711.4; no
-
Alabama 7 1819 22 52,423 Colorado 8 1876 38 104,100 Alaska 6 1959 51 656,424 Iowa 4 1846 29 56,276 Maryland 8 1788 7 12,407 Missouri 8 1821 24 69,709 New Jersey 9 1787 3 8,722 Ohio 4 1803 17 44,828 South Carolina 13 1788 8 32,008 Utah 4 1896 45 84,904 Wisconsin 9 1848 30 65,499 - \(\hat{y} = -87065.3 + 7828.532x\)
- Alabama: 85,162.404; the prior estimate was closer. Alaska is an outlier.
- yes, with the exception of Hawaii