$$\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}$$ $$\newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}$$ $$\newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}$$ $$\newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}$$ $$\newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}$$ $$\newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}$$ $$\newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}$$ $$\newcommand{\norm}{\| #1 \|}$$ $$\newcommand{\inner}{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}$$ $$\newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}$$

# 4.9 Applications of definite integrals

$$\newcommand{\vecs}{\overset { \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} }$$

$$\newcommand{\vecd}{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}}$$

## Integrals Involving Exponential functions

Exponential functions are used in many real-life applications. The number e is often associated with compounded or accelerating growth, as we have seen in earlier sections about the derivative. Although the derivative represents a rate of change or a growth rate, the integral represents the total change or the total growth. Let’s look at an example in which integration of an exponential function solves a common business application.

A price–demand function tells us the relationship between the quantity of a product demanded and the price of the product. In general, price decreases as quantity demanded increases. The marginal price–demand function is the derivative of the price–demand function and it tells us how fast the price changes at a given level of production. These functions are used in business to determine the price–elasticity of demand, and to help companies determine whether changing production levels would be profitable.

Example $$\PageIndex{1}$$: Finding a Price–Demand Equation

Find the price–demand equation for a particular brand of toothpaste at a supermarket chain when the demand is 50 tubes per week at $2.35 per tube, given that the marginal price—demand function, $$p′(x),$$ for x number of tubes per week, is given as $p'(x)=−0.015e^{−0.01x}.$ If the supermarket chain sells 100 tubes per week, what price should it set? Solution To find the price–demand equation, integrate the marginal price–demand function. First find the antiderivative, then look at the particulars. Thus, $p(x)=∫−0.015e^{−0.01x}dx=−0.015∫e^{−0.01x}dx.$ Using substitution, let $$u=−0.01x$$ and $$du=−0.01dx$$. Then, divide both sides of the du equation by −0.01. This gives $\dfrac{−0.015}{−0.01}∫e^udu=1.5∫e^udu=1.5e^u+C=1.5e^{−0.01}x+C.$ The next step is to solve for C. We know that when the price is$2.35 per tube, the demand is 50 tubes per week. This means

$p(50)=1.5e^{−0.01(50)}+C=2.35.$

Now, just solve for C:

$C=2.35−1.5e^{−0.5}=2.35−0.91=1.44.$

Thus,

$p(x)=1.5e^{−0.01x}+1.44.$

If the supermarket sells 100 tubes of toothpaste per week, the price would be

$p(100)=1.5e−0.01(100)+1.44=1.5e−1+1.44≈1.99.$

The supermarket should charge \$1.99 per tube if it is selling 100 tubes per week.

One of the most prevalent applications of exponential functions involves growth and decay models. Exponential growth and decay show up in a host of natural applications. From population growth and continuously compounded interest to radioactive decay and Newton’s law of cooling, exponential functions are ubiquitous in nature. In this section, we examine exponential growth and decay in the context of some of these applications.

## Exponential Growth Model

Many systems exhibit exponential growth. These systems follow a model of the form $$y=y_0e^{kt},$$ where $$y_0$$ represents the initial state of the system and $$k$$ is a positive constant, called the growth constant. Notice that in an exponential growth model, we have

$y′=ky_0e^{kt}=ky. \label{eq1}$

That is, the rate of growth is proportional to the current function value. This is a key feature of exponential growth. Equation \ref{eq1} involves derivatives and is called a differential equation.

Exponential Growthl

Systems that exhibit exponential growth increase according to the mathematical model

$y=y_0e^{kt}$

where $$y_0$$ represents the initial state of the system and $$k>0$$ is a constant, called the growth constant.

Population growth is a common example of exponential growth. Consider a population of bacteria, for instance. It seems plausible that the rate of population growth would be proportional to the size of the population. After all, the more bacteria there are to reproduce, the faster the population grows. Figure $$\PageIndex{1}$$ and Table $$\PageIndex{1}$$ represent the growth of a population of bacteria with an initial population of 200 bacteria and a growth constant of 0.02. Notice that after only 2 hours (120 minutes), the population is 10 times its original size! Figure $$\PageIndex{1}$$: An example of exponential growth for bacteria.

Table $$\PageIndex{1}$$: Exponential Growth of a Bacterial Population
Time(min) Population Size (no. of bacteria)
10 244
20 298
30 364
40 445
50 544
60 664
70 811
80 991
90 1210
100 1478
110 1805
120 2205

Note that we are using a continuous function to model what is inherently discrete behavior. At any given time, the real-world population contains a whole number of bacteria, although the model takes on noninteger values. When using exponential growth models, we must always be careful to interpret the function values in the context of the phenomenon we are modeling.

Example $$\PageIndex{1}$$: Population Growth

Consider the population of bacteria described earlier. This population grows according to the function $$f(t)=200e^{0.02t},$$ where t is measured in minutes. How many bacteria are present in the population after $$5$$ hours ($$300$$ minutes)? When does the population reach $$100,000$$ bacteria?

Solution

We have $$f(t)=200e^{0.02t}.$$ Then

$f(300)=200e^{0.02(300)}≈80,686. \nonumber$

There are $$80,686$$ bacteria in the population after $$5$$ hours.

To find when the population reaches $$100,000$$ bacteria, we solve the equation

\begin{align} 100,000 &= 200e^{0.02t} \nonumber \\ 500 &=e^{0.02t} \nonumber \\ \ln 500 &=0.02 t \nonumber \\ t&=\dfrac{\ln 500}{0.02}≈310.73. \nonumber \end{align} \nonumber

The population reaches $$100,000$$ bacteria after $$310.73$$ minutes.

Exercise $$\PageIndex{1}$$

Consider a population of bacteria that grows according to the function $$f(t)=500e^{0.05t}$$, where $$t$$ is measured in minutes. How many bacteria are present in the population after 4 hours? When does the population reach $$100$$ million bacteria?

Use the process from the previous example.

There are $$81,377,396$$ bacteria in the population after $$4$$ hours. The population reaches $$100$$ million bacteria after $$244.12$$ minutes.

Let’s now turn our attention to a financial application: compound interest. Interest that is not compounded is called simple interest. Simple interest is paid once, at the end of the specified time period (usually $$1$$ year). So, if we put $$1000$$ in a savings account earning $$2%$$ simple interest per year, then at the end of the year we have

$1000(1+0.02)=1020.$

Compound interest is paid multiple times per year, depending on the compounding period. Therefore, if the bank compounds the interest every $$6$$ months, it credits half of the year’s interest to the account after $$6$$ months. During the second half of the year, the account earns interest not only on the initial $$1000$$, but also on the interest earned during the first half of the year. Mathematically speaking, at the end of the year, we have

$1000 \left(1+\dfrac{0.02}{2}\right)^2=1020.10.$

Similarly, if the interest is compounded every $$4$$ months, we have

$1000 \left(1+\dfrac{0.02}{3}\right)^3=1020.13,$

and if the interest is compounded daily ($$365$$ times per year), we have $$1020.20$$. If we extend this concept, so that the interest is compounded continuously, after $$t$$ years we have

$1000\lim_{n→∞} \left(1+\dfrac{0.02}{n}\right)^{nt}.$

Now let’s manipulate this expression so that we have an exponential growth function. Recall that the number $$e$$ can be expressed as a limit:

$e=\lim_{m→∞}\left(1+\dfrac{1}{m}\right)^m.$

Based on this, we want the expression inside the parentheses to have the form $$(1+1/m)$$. Let $$n=0.02m$$. Note that as $$n→∞, m→∞$$ as well. Then we get

$1000\lim_{n→∞}\left(1+\dfrac{0.02}{n}\right)^{nt}=1000\lim_{m→∞}\left(1+\dfrac{0.02}{0.02m}\right)^{0.02mt}=1000\left[\lim_{m→∞}\left(1+\dfrac{1}{m}\right)^m\right]^{0.02t}.$

We recognize the limit inside the brackets as the number $$e$$. So, the balance in our bank account after $$t$$ years is given by $$1000 e^{0.02t}$$. Generalizing this concept, we see that if a bank account with an initial balance of $$P$$ earns interest at a rate of $$r%$$, compounded continuously, then the balance of the account after $$t$$ years is

$Balance=Pe^{rt}.$

Example $$\PageIndex{2}$$: Compound Interest

A 25-year-old student is offered an opportunity to invest some money in a retirement account that pays $$5%$$ annual interest compounded continuously. How much does the student need to invest today to have $$1$$ million when she retires at age $$65$$? What if she could earn $$6%$$ annual interest compounded continuously instead?

Solution

We have

$1,000,000=Pe^{0.05(40)}$

$P=135,335.28.$

She must invest $$135,335.28$$ at $$5%$$ interest.

If, instead, she is able to earn $$6%,$$ then the equation becomes

$1,000,000=Pe^{0.06(40)}$

$P=90,717.95.$

In this case, she needs to invest only $$90,717.95.$$ This is roughly two-thirds the amount she needs to invest at $$5%$$. The fact that the interest is compounded continuously greatly magnifies the effect of the $$1%$$ increase in interest rate.

Exercise $$\PageIndex{2}$$

Suppose instead of investing at age $$25\sqrt{b^2−4ac}$$, the student waits until age $$35$$. How much would she have to invest at $$5%$$? At $$6%$$?

Hint

Use the process from the previous example.

At $$5%$$ interest, she must invest $$223,130.16$$. At $$6%$$ interest, she must invest $$165,298.89.$$

If a quantity grows exponentially, the time it takes for the quantity to double remains constant. In other words, it takes the same amount of time for a population of bacteria to grow from $$100$$ to $$200$$ bacteria as it does to grow from $$10,000$$ to $$20,000$$ bacteria. This time is called the doubling time. To calculate the doubling time, we want to know when the quantity reaches twice its original size. So we have

\begin{align} 2y_0 & =y_0e^{kt} \nonumber \\ 2&=e^{kt} \nonumber \\ \ln 2 &=kt \nonumber \\ t &=\dfrac{\ln 2}{k}. \nonumber \end{align}

Definition: Doubling Time

If a quantity grows exponentially, the doubling time is the amount of time it takes the quantity to double. It is given by

$\text{Doubling time}=\dfrac{\ln 2}{k}.$

Example $$\PageIndex{3}$$: Using the Doubling Time

Assume a population of fish grows exponentially. A pond is stocked initially with $$500$$ fish. After $$6$$ months, there are $$1000$$ fish in the pond. The owner will allow his friends and neighbors to fish on his pond after the fish population reaches $$10,000$$. When will the owner’s friends be allowed to fish?

Solution

We know it takes the population of fish $$6$$ months to double in size. So, if $$t$$ represents time in months, by the doubling-time formula, we have $$6=(\ln 2)/k$$. Then, $$k=(\ln 2)/6$$. Thus, the population is given by $$y=500e^{((\ln 2)/6)t}$$. To figure out when the population reaches $$10,000$$ fish, we must solve the following equation:

\begin{align} 10,000 &=500e^{(\ln 2/6)t} \nonumber \\ 20&=e^{(\ln 2/6)t} \nonumber \\ \ln 20 &=\left(\dfrac{\ln 2}{6}\right)t \nonumber \\ t&=\dfrac{6(\ln 20)}{\ln 2} \nonumber \\ &≈25.93. \nonumber \end{align} \nonumber

The owner’s friends have to wait $$25.93$$ months (a little more than $$2$$ years) to fish in the pond.

Exercise $$\PageIndex{3}$$

Suppose it takes $$9$$ months for the fish population in Example $$\PageIndex{3}$$ to reach $$1000$$ fish. Under these circumstances, how long do the owner’s friends have to wait?

Hint

Use the process from the previous example.

$$38.90$$ months

## Exponential Decay Model

Exponential functions can also be used to model populations that shrink (from disease, for example), or chemical compounds that break down over time. We say that such systems exhibit exponential decay, rather than exponential growth. The model is nearly the same, except there is a negative sign in the exponent. Thus, for some positive constant $$k$$, we have

$y=y_0e^{−kt}.$

As with exponential growth, there is a differential equation associated with exponential decay. We have

$y′=−ky_0e^{−kt}=−ky.$

Exponential Decay

Systems that exhibit exponential decay behave according to the model

$y=y_0e^{−kt},$

where $$y_0$$ represents the initial state of the system and $$k>0$$ is a constant, called the decay constant.

Figure $$\PageIndex{2}$$ shows a graph of a representative exponential decay function. Figure $$\PageIndex{2}$$: An example of exponential decay.

Let’s look at a physical application of exponential decay. Newton’s law of cooling says that an object cools at a rate proportional to the difference between the temperature of the object and the temperature of the surroundings. In other words, if $$T$$ represents the temperature of the object and $$T_a$$ represents the ambient temperature in a room, then

$T′=−k(T−T_a).$

Note that this is not quite the right model for exponential decay. We want the derivative to be proportional to the function, and this expression has the additional $$T_a$$ term. Fortunately, we can make a change of variables that resolves this issue. Let $$y(t)=T(t)−T_a$$. Then $$y′(t)=T′(t)−0=T′(t)$$, and our equation becomes

$y′=−ky.$

From our previous work, we know this relationship between $$y$$ and its derivative leads to exponential decay. Thus,

$y=y_0e^{−kt},$

and we see that

$T−T_a=(T_0−T_a)e^{−kt}$

$T=(T_0−T_a)e^{−kt}+T_a$

where $$T_0$$ represents the initial temperature. Let’s apply this formula in the following example.

Example $$\PageIndex{4}$$: Newton’s Law of Cooling

According to experienced baristas, the optimal temperature to serve coffee is between $$155°F$$ and $$175°F$$. Suppose coffee is poured at a temperature of $$200°F$$, and after $$2$$ minutes in a $$70°F$$ room it has cooled to $$180°F$$. When is the coffee first cool enough to serve? When is the coffee too cold to serve? Round answers to the nearest half minute.

Solution

We have

\begin{align*} T&=(T_0−T_a)e^{−kt}+T_a \\[5pt] 180&=(200−70)e^{−k(2)}+70 \\[5pt] 110&=130e^{−2k} \\[5pt] \dfrac{11}{13}&=e^{−2k} \\[5pt] \ln \dfrac{11}{13}&=−2k \\[5pt] \ln 11−\ln 13&=−2k \\[5pt] k&=\dfrac{\ln 13−\ln 11}{2} \end{align*}

Then, the model is

$T=130e^{(\ln 11−\ln 13/2)t}+70. \nonumber$

The coffee reaches $$175°F$$ when

\begin{align*} 175&=130e^{(\ln 11−\ln 13/2)t}+70 \\[5pt]105&=130e^{(\ln 11−\ln 13/2)t} \\[5pt] \dfrac{21}{26}&=e^{(\ln 11−\ln 13/2)t} \\[5pt] \ln \dfrac{21}{26}&=\dfrac{\ln 11−\ln 13}{2}t \\[5pt] \ln 21−\ln 26&=\left(\dfrac{\ln 11−\ln 13}{2}\right)t \\[5pt] t&=\dfrac{2(\ln 21−\ln 26)}{\ln 11−\ln 13}\\[5pt] &≈2.56. \end{align*}

The coffee can be served about $$2.5$$ minutes after it is poured. The coffee reaches $$155°F$$ at

\begin{align*} 155&=130e^{(\ln 11−\ln 13/2)t}+70 \\[5pt] 85 &=130e^{(\ln 11−\ln 13)t} \\[5pt] \dfrac{17}{26} &=e^{(\ln 11−\ln 13)t} \\[5pt] \ln 17−\ln 26 &=\left(\dfrac{\ln 11−\ln 13}{2}\right)t \\[5pt] t&=\dfrac{2(\ln 17−\ln 26)}{\ln 11−\ln 13} \\[5pt] &≈5.09.\end{align*}

The coffee is too cold to be served about $$5$$ minutes after it is poured.

Exercise $$\PageIndex{4}$$

Suppose the room is warmer $$(75°F)$$ and, after $$2$$ minutes, the coffee has cooled only to $$185°F.$$ When is the coffee first cool enough to serve? When is the coffee be too cold to serve? Round answers to the nearest half minute.

Hint

Use the process from the previous example.

The coffee is first cool enough to serve about $$3.5$$ minutes after it is poured. The coffee is too cold to serve about $$7$$ minutes after it is poured.

Just as systems exhibiting exponential growth have a constant doubling time, systems exhibiting exponential decay have a constant half-life. To calculate the half-life, we want to know when the quantity reaches half its original size. Therefore, we have

$$\dfrac{y_0}{2}=y_0e^{−kt}$$

$$\dfrac{1}{2}=e^{−kt}$$

$$−\ln 2=−kt$$

$$t=\dfrac{\ln 2}{k}$$.

Note: This is the same expression we came up with for doubling time.

Definition: Half-Life

If a quantity decays exponentially, the half-life is the amount of time it takes the quantity to be reduced by half. It is given by

$\text{Half-life}=\dfrac{\ln 2}{k}.$

Example $$\PageIndex{5}$$: Radiocarbon Dating

One of the most common applications of an exponential decay model is carbon dating. Carbon-14 decays (emits a radioactive particle) at a regular and consistent exponential rate. Therefore, if we know how much carbon was originally present in an object and how much carbon remains, we can determine the age of the object. The half-life of carbon-14 is approximately 5730 years—meaning, after that many years, half the material has converted from the original carbon-14 to the new nonradioactive nitrogen-14. If we have 100 g carbon-14 today, how much is left in 50 years? If an artifact that originally contained 100 g of carbon now contains 10 g of carbon, how old is it? Round the answer to the nearest hundred years.

Solution

We have

$5730=\dfrac{\ln 2}{k}$

$k=\dfrac{\ln 2}{5730}.$

So, the model says

$y=100e^{−(\ln 2/5730)t}.$

In $$50$$ years, we have

$$y=100e^{−(\ln 2/5730)(50)}≈99.40$$.

Therefore, in $$50$$ years, $$99.40$$ g of carbon-14 remains.

To determine the age of the artifact, we must solve

\begin{align} 10 &=100e^{−(\ln 2/5730)t} \\ \dfrac{1}{10} &= e^{−(\ln 2/5730)t} \\ t &≈19035. \end{align}

The artifact is about $$19,000$$ years old.

Exercise $$\PageIndex{5}$$: Carbon-14 Decay

If we have 100 g of carbon-14 , how much is left after. years? If an artifact that originally contained 100 g of carbon now contains 20 g of carbon, how old is it? Round the answer to the nearest hundred years.

Example $$\PageIndex{2}$$: Growth of Bacteria in a Culture

Suppose the rate of growth of bacteria in a Petri dish is given by $$q(t)=3^t$$, where t is given in hours and $$q(t)$$ is given in thousands of bacteria per hour. If a culture starts with 10,000 bacteria, find a function $$Q(t)$$ that gives the number of bacteria in the Petri dish at any time t. How many bacteria are in the dish after 2 hours?

Solution

We have

$Q(t)=∫3^tdt=\dfrac{3^t}{\ln 3}+C.$

Then, at $$t=0$$ we have $$Q(0)=10=\dfrac{1}{\ln 3}+C,$$ so $$C≈9.090$$ and we get

$Q(t)=\dfrac{3^t}{\ln 3}+9.090.$

At time $$t=2$$, we have

$Q(2)=\dfrac{3^2}{\ln 3}+9.090$

$=17.282.$

After 2 hours, there are 17,282 bacteria in the dish.

Exercise $$\PageIndex{2}$$

From Example, suppose the bacteria grow at a rate of $$q(t)=2^t$$. Assume the culture still starts with 10,000 bacteria. Find $$Q(t)$$. How many bacteria are in the dish after 3 hours?

Hint

Use the procedure from Example to solve the problem

$$Q(t)=\dfrac{2^t}{\ln 2}+8.557.$$ There are 20,099 bacteria in the dish after 3 hours.

Example $$\PageIndex{3}$$: Fruit Fly Population Growth

Suppose a population of fruit flies increases at a rate of $$g(t)=2e^{0.02t}$$, in flies per day. If the initial population of fruit flies is 100 flies, how many flies are in the population after 10 days?

Solution

Let $$G(t)$$ represent the number of flies in the population at time t. Applying the net change theorem, we have

$$G(10)=G(0)+∫^{10}_02e^{0.02t}dt$$

$$=100+[\dfrac{2}{0.02}e^{0.02t}]∣^{10}_0$$

$$=100+[100e^{0.02t}]∣^{10}_0$$

$$=100+100e^{0.2}−100$$

$$≈122.$$

There are 122 flies in the population after 10 days.

Exercise $$\PageIndex{3}$$

Suppose the rate of growth of the fly population is given by $$g(t)=e^{0.01t},$$ and the initial fly population is 100 flies. How many flies are in the population after 15 days?

Hint

Use the process from Example to solve the problem.