In Section 4.1 we saw that one revolution has a radian measure of rad. Note that is the ratio of the circumference (i.e. total arc length) of a circle to its radius :
Clearly, that ratio is independent of . In general, the radian measure of an angle is the ratio of the arc length cut off by the corresponding central angle in a circle to the radius of the circle, independent of the radius.
To see this, recall our formal definition of a radian: the central angle in a circle of radius which intercepts an arc of length . So suppose that we have a circle of radius and we place a central angle with radian measure on top of another central angle with radian measure , as in Figure 4.2.1(a). Clearly, the combined central angle of the two angles has radian measure , and the combined arc length is .
Figure 4.2.1 Radian measure and arc length
Now suppose that we cut the angle with radian measure in half, as in Figure 4.2.1(b). Clearly, this cuts the arc length in half as well. Thus, we see that
and in general, for any ,
so that
Intuitively, it is obvious that shrinking or magnifying a circle preserves the measure of a central angle even as the radius changes. The above discussion says more, namely that the ratio of the length of an intercepted arc to the radius is preserved, precisely because that ratio is the measure of the central angle in radians (see Figure 4.2.2).
Figure 4.2.2 Circles with the same central angle, different radii
We thus get a simple formula for the length of an arc:
In a circle of radius , let be the length of an arc intercepted by a central angle with radian measure . Then the arc length is:
Example 4.3
In a circle of radius cm, what is the length of the arc intercepted by a central angle of measure rad?
Solution
Using Equation , we get:
Example 4.4
In a circle of radius ft, what is the length of the arc intercepted by a central angle of measure ?
Solution
Using Equation blindly with , we would get ft. But this impossible, since a circle of radius ft has a circumference of only ft! Our error was in using the angle measured in degrees, not radians. So first convert to radians, then use :
Note that since the arc length and radius are usually given in the same units, radian measure is really unitless, since you can think of the units canceling in the ratio , which is just . This is another reason why radians are so widely used.
Example 4.5
A central angle in a circle of radius m cuts off an arc of length m. What is the measure of the angle in radians? What is the measure in degrees?
Solution
Letting and in Equation , we get:
In degrees, the angle is:
For central angles rad, i.e. , it may not be clear what is meant by the intercepted arc, since the angle is larger than one revolution and hence "wraps around'' the circle more than once. We will take the approach that such an arc consists of the full circumference plus any additional arc length determined by the angle. In other words, Equation is still valid for angles rad.
What about negative angles? In this case using would mean that the arc length is negative, which violates the usual concept of length. So we will adopt the convention of only using nonnegative central angles when discussing arc length.
Example 4.6
A rope is fastened to a wall in two places ft apart at the same height. A cylindrical container with a radius of ft is pushed away from the wall as far as it can go while being held in by the rope, as in Figure 4.2.3 which shows the top view. If the center of the container is feet away from the point on the wall midway between the ends of the rope, what is the length of the rope?
Figure 4.2.3
Solution:
We see that, by symmetry, the total length of the rope is . Also, notice that is a right triangle, so the hypotenuse has length ft, by the Pythagorean Theorem. Now since is tangent to the circular container, we know that is a right angle. So by the Pythagorean Theorem we have
By Equation the arc has length , where is the supplement of . So since
we have
Converting to radians, we get rad. Thus,
Example 4.7
The centers of two belt pulleys, with radii of cm and cm, respectively, are cm apart. Find the total length of the belt around the pulleys.
Solution
In Figure 4.2.4 we see that, by symmetry, .
Figure 4.2.4 Belt pulleys with radii 5 cm and 8 cm
First, at the center of the pulley with radius , draw a circle of radius , which is the difference in the radii of the two pulleys. Let be the point where this circle intersects . Then we know that the tangent line to this smaller circle is perpendicular to the line segment . Thus, is a right angle, and so the length of is
by the Pythagorean Theorem. Now since and and , the quadrilateral must be a rectangle. In particular, , so .
By Equation we know that and , where the angles are measured in radians. So thinking of angles in radians (using rad ), we see from Figure 4.2.4 that
where
Thus, rad. So since and are parallel, we have rad. Thus, rad. Hence,