9.4: Residues
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
In this section we’ll explore calculating residues. We’ve seen enough already to know that this will be useful. We will see that even more clearly when we look at the residue theorem in the next section.
We introduced residues in the previous topic. We repeat the definition here for completeness.
Consider the function f(z) with an isolated singularity at z0, i.e. defined on the region 0<|z−z0|<r and with Laurent series (on that region)
f(z)=∞∑n=1bn(z−z0)n+∞∑n=0an(z−z0)n.
The residue of f at z0 is b1. This is denoted
Res(f,z0)=b1 or Resz=z0f=b1.
What is the importance of the residue? If γ is a small, simple closed curve that goes counterclockwise around b1 then
∫γf(z)=2πib1.
This is easy to see by integrating the Laurent series term by term. The only nonzero integral comes from the term b1/z.
f(z)=e1/2z=1+12z+12(2z)2+ ...
has an isolated singularity at 0. From the Laurent series we see that Res(f,0)=1/2.
(i) Let
f(z)=1z3+2z2+4z+5+6z.
f has a pole of order 3 at z=0 and Res(f,0)=4.
(ii) Suppose
f(z)=2z+g(z),
where g is analytic at z=0. Then, f has a simple pole at 0 and Res(f,0)=2.
(iii) Let
f(z)=cos(z)=1−z2/2!+ ...
Then f is analytic at z=0 and Res(f,0)=0.
(iv) Let
f(z)=sin(z)z=1z(z−z33!+ ...)=1−z23!+ ...
So, f has a removable singularity at z=0 and Res(f,0)=0.
Let
f(z)=zz2+1.
Find the poles and residues of f.
Solution
Using partial fractions we write
f(z)=z(z−i)(z+i)=12⋅1z−i+12⋅1z+i.
The poles are at z=±i. We compute the residues at each pole:
At z=i:
f(z)=12⋅1z−i+ something analytic at i.
Therefore the pole is simple and Res(f,i)=1/2.
At z=−i:
f(z)=12⋅1z+i+ something analytic at −i.
Therefore the pole is simple and Res(f,−i)=1/2.
Let
f(z)=−1z(1−z)
then we have the following Laurent expansions for f around z=0.
On 0<|z|<1:
f(z)=−1z⋅11−z=−1z(1+z+z2+ ...).
Therefore the pole at z=0 is simple and Res(f,0)=−1.
On 1<|z|<∞:
f(z)=1z2⋅11−1/z=1z(1+1z+1z2+ ...).
Even though this is a valid Laurent expansion you must not use it to compute the residue at 0. This is because the definition of residue requires that we use the Laurent series on the region 0<|z−z0|<r.
Let
f(z)=log(1+z).
This has a singularity at z=−1, but it is not isolated, so not a pole and therefore there is no residue at z=−1.
Residues at Simple Poles
Simple poles occur frequently enough that we’ll study computing their residues in some detail. Here are a number of ways to spot a simple pole and compute its residue. The justification for all of them goes back to Laurent series.
Suppose f(z) has an isolated singularity at z=z0. Then we have the following properties.
If the Laurent series for f(z) has the form
b1z−z0+a0+a1(z−z0)+ ...
then f has a simple pole at z0 and Res(f,z0)=b1.
If
g(z)=(z−z0)f(z)
is analytic at z0 then z0 is either a simple pole or are movable singularity. In either case Res(f,z0)=g(z0). (In the removable singularity case the residue is 0.)
- Proof
-
Directly from the Laurent series for f around z0.
If f has a simple pole at z0 then
limz→z0(z−z0)f(z)=Res(f,z0)
This says that the limit exists and equals the residue. Conversely, if the limit exists then either the pole is simple, or f is analytic at z0. In both cases the limit equals the residue.
- Proof
-
Directly from the Laurent series for f around z0.
If f has a simple pole at z0 and g(z) is analytic at z0 then
Res(fg,z0)=g(z0)Res(f,z0).
If g(z0)≠0 then
Res(f/g,z0)=1g(z0)Res(f,z0).
- Proof
-
Since z0 is a simple pole,
f(z)=b1z−z0+a0+a1(z−z0)
Since g is analytic,
g(z)=c0+c1(z−z0)+ ...,
where c0=g(z0). Multiplying these series together it is clear that
Res(fg,z0)=c0b1=g(z0)Res(f,z0). QED
The statement about quotients f/g follows from the proof for products because 1/g is analytic at z0.
If g(z) has a simple zero at z0 then 1/g(z) has a simple pole at z0 and
Res(1/g,z0)=1g′(z0).
- Proof
-
The algebra for this is similar to what we’ve done several times above. The Taylor expansion for g is
g(z)=a1(z−z0)+a2(z−z0)2+ ...,
where a1=g′(z0). So
1g(z)=1a1(z−z0)(11+a2a1(z−z0)+ ...)
The second factor on the right is analytic at z0 and equals 1 at z0. Therefore we know the Laurent expansion of 1/g is
1g(z)=1a1(z−z0)(1+c1(z−z0)+ ...)
Clearly the residue is 1/a1=1/g′(z0). QED.
Let
f(z)=2+z+z2(z−2)(z−3)(z−4)(z−5).
Show all the poles are simple and compute their residues.
Solution
The poles are at z=2,3,4,5. They are all isolated. We'll look at z=2 the others are similar. Multiplying by z−2 we get
g(z)=(z−2)f(z)=2+z+z2(z−3)(z−4)(z−5).
This is analytic at z=2 and
g(2)=8−6=−43.
So the pole is simple and Res(f,2)=−4/3.
Let
f(z)=1sin(z).
Find all the poles and their residues.
Solution
The poles of f(z) are the zeros of sin(z), i.e. nπ for n an integer. Since the derivative
sin′(nπ)=cos(nπ)≠0,
the zeros are simple and by Property 5 above
Res(f,nπ)=1cos(nπ)=(−1)n.
Let
f(z)=1z(z2+1)(z−2)2.
Identify all the poles and say which ones are simple.
Solution
Clearly the poles are at z=0, ±i, 2.
At z=0:
g(z)=zf(z)
is analytic at 0 and g(0)=1/4. So the pole is simple and the residue is g(0)=1/4.
At z=i:
g(z)=(z−i)f(z)=1z(z+i)(z−2)2
is analytic at i, the pole is simple and the residue is g(i).
At z=−i: This is similar to the case z=i. The pole is simple.
At z=2:
g(z)=(z−2)f(z)=1z(z2+1)(z−2)
is not analytic at 2, so the pole is not simple. (It should be obvious that it’s a pole of order 2.)
Let p(z), q(z) be analytic at z=z0. Assume p(z0)≠0, q(z0)=0, q′(z0)≠0. Find
Resz=z0p(z)q(z).
Solution
Since q′(z0)≠0, q has a simple zero at z0. So 1/q has a simple pole at z0 and
Res(1/q,z0)=1q′(z0)
Since p(z0)≠0 we know
Res(p/q,z0)=p(z0)Res(1/q,z0)=p(z0)q′(z0).
Residues at finite poles
For higher-order poles we can make statements similar to those for simple poles, but the formulas and computations are more involved. The general principle is the following
If f(z) has a pole of order k at z0 then
g(z)=(z−z0)kf(z)
is analytic at z0 and if
g(z)=a0+a1(z−z0)+ ...
then
Res(f,z0)=ak−1=g(k−1)(z0)(k−1)!.
- Proof
-
This is clear using Taylor and Laurent series for g and f.
Let
f(z)=sinh(z)z5
and find the residue at z=0.
Solution
We know the Taylor series for
sinh(z)=z+z3/3!+z5/5!+ ...
(You can find this using sinh(z)=(ez−e−z)/2 and the Taylor series for ez.) Therefore,
f(z)=1z4+13!z2+15!+ ...
We see Res(f,0)=0.
Note, we could have seen this by realizing that f(z) is an even function.
Let
f(z)=sinh(z)ezz5.
Find the residue at z=0.
Solution
It is clear that Res(f,0) equals the coefficient of z4 in the Taylor expansion of sinh(z)ez. We compute this directly as
sinh(z)ez=(z+z33!+ ...)(1+z+z22+z33!+ ...)= ...+(14!+13!)z4+ ...
So
Res(f,0)=13!+14!=524.
Find the residue of
f(z)=1z(z2+1)(z−2)2
at z=2.
Solution
g(z)=(z−2)2f(z)=1z(z2+1) is analytic at z=2. So, the residue we want is the a1 term in its Taylor series, i.e. g′(2). This is easy, if dull, to compute
Res(f,2)=g′(2)=−13100
cot(z)
The function cot(z) turns out to be very useful in applications. This stems largely from the fact that it has simple poles at all multiples of π and the residue is 1 at each pole. We show that first.
f(z)=cot(z) has simple poles at nπ for n an integer and Res(f,nπ)=1.
- Proof
-
f(z)=cos(z)sin(z).
This has poles at the zeros of sin, i.e. at z=nπ. At poles f is of the form p/q where q has a simple zero at z0 and p(z0)≠0. Thus we can use the formula
Res(f,z0)=p(z0)q′(z0).
In our case, we have
Res(f,nπ)=cos(nπ)cos(nπ)=1,
as claimed.
Sometimes we need more terms in the Laurent expansion of cot(z). There is no known easy formula for the terms, but we can easily compute as many as we need using the following technique.
Compute the first several terms of the Laurent expansion of cot(z) around z=0.
Solution
Since cot(z) has a simple pole at 0 we know
cot(z)=b1z+z0+a1z+a2z2+ ...
We also know
cot(z)=cos(z)sin(z)=1−z2/2+z4/4!− ...z−z3/3!+z5/5!− ...
Cross multiplying the two expressions we get
(b1z+a0+a1z+a2z2+ ...)(z−z33!+z55!− ...)=1−z22+z44!− ...
We can do the multiplication and equate the coefficients of like powers of z.
b1+a0z+(−b13!+a1)z2+(−a03!+a2)z3+(b15!−a13!+a3)z4=1−z22!+z44!
So, starting from b1=1 and a0=0, we get
−b1/3!+a1=−1/2! ⇒ a1=−1/3−a0/3!+a2=0 ⇒ a2=0b1/5!−a1/3!+a3=1/4! ⇒ a3=−1/45
As noted above, all the even terms are 0 as they should be. We have
cot(z)=1z−z3−z345+...