Processing math: 100%
Skip to main content
Library homepage
 

Text Color

Text Size

 

Margin Size

 

Font Type

Enable Dyslexic Font
Mathematics LibreTexts

1.3: The Natural Numbers and Mathematical Induction

( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

We will assume familiarity with the set N of natural numbers, with the usual arithmetic operations of addition and multiplication on n, and with the notion of what it means for one natural number to be less than another.

In addition, we will also assume the following property of the natural numbers.

Well-Ordering Property of the Natural Numbers

If A is a non empty subset of N, then there exists an element A such that x for all xA.

To paraphrase the previous property, every nonempty subset of positive integers has a smallest element.

The principle of mathematical induction is a useful tool for proving facts about sequences.

Theorem 1.3.1: Principle of Mathematical Induction

For each natural number nN, suppose that P(n) denotes a proposition which is either true or false. Let A={nN:P(n) is true }. Suppose the following conditions hold:

  1. 1A.
  2. For each kN, if kA, then k+1A.

Then A=N.

Proof

Suppose conditions (a) and (b) hold. Assume, by way of contradiction, that AN. Set B=NA, that is B={nN:P(n) is false }. Then B is a nonempty subset of N. By the Well-Ordering Property of the natural numbers, there exists a smallest element B and, hence, we have that P(k) is true. By condition (b), we obtain that P(k+1) is true. But k+1=, and P() is false, since B. This is a contradiction, so the conclusion follows.

To paraphrase, the principle says that, given a list of propositions P(n), one for each nN, if P(1) is true and, moreover, P(k+1) is true whenever P(k) is true, then all propositions are true.

We will refer to this principle as mathematical induction or simply induction. Condition (a) above is called the base case and condition (b) the inductive step. When proving (b), the statement P(k) is called the inductive hypothesis.

Example 1.3.1

Prove using induction that for all nN

1+2++n=n(n+1)2.

Solution

The statement P(n) is the equality 1+2++n=n(n+1)2. Now the base case says that 1=1(1+1)2, which is clearly true.

Suppose P(k) is true for some kN. That is, suppose that 1+2++n=k(k+1)2 (this is the inductive hypothesis). Now we have

1+2++k+(k+1)=k(k+1)2+(k+1)=k(k+1)+2(k+1)2=(k+1)(k+2)2.

This shows that P(k+1) is true. We have now proved conditions (a) and (b) of Theorem 1.3.1. Therefore, by the principle of mathematical induction we conclude that

1+2++n=n(n+1)2 for all nN.

Example 1.3.2

Prove using induction that for all nN,7n2n is divisible by 5.

Solution

For n=1, we have 72=5, which is clearly a multiple of 5.

Suppose that 7k2k is a multiple of 5 for some kN. That is, there is an integer j such that 7k2k=5j. Let us write 7k2k=5j. Now, substituting this expression below, we have

7k+12k+1=77k22k=7(2k+5j)22k=72k22k+75j=2k(72)+57j=5(2k+7j)

It follows that 7k+12k+1 is a multiple of 5. This proves the inductive step.

We conclude by induction that 7n2n is divisible by 5 for all n(N).

Example 1.3.3

Prove using induction that for all nN

n+12n

Solution

For n=1, we have 1+1=2=21, so the base case is true.

Suppose next that k+12k for some kN. Then k+1+12k+1. Since 2k is a positive integer, we also have 12k. Therefore,

(k+1)+12k+12k+2k=22k=2k+1.

We conclude by the principle of mathematical induction that n+12n for all nN.

The following result is known as the Generalized Principle of Mathematical Induction. It simply states that we can start the induction process at any integer n0, and then we obtain the truth of all statements P(n) for nn0.

Theorem 1.3.2 - Generalized Principle of Mathematical Induction.

Let n0N and for each natural nn0, suppose that P(n) denotes a proposition which is either true or false. Let A={nN:P(n) is true}. Suppose the following two conditions hold:

  1. n0A.
  2. For each kN, kn0, if kA, then k+1A.
Proof

Suppose conditions (a) and (b) hold. Assume, by way of contradiction, that A{kN:kn0}. Set B={nN:nn0,P(n) is false }. Then B is a nonempty subset of N. By the Well-Ordering Property of natural numbers, there exists a smallest element B. By condition (a), n0B. Hence, n0+1. It follows that k=1n0. Since k<, kB and, so, we have that P(k) is true. By condition (b), we obtain that P(k+1) is true. But k+1=, and P() is false, since B. This is a contradiction, so the conclusion follows.

Example 1.3.4

Prove by induction that 3n<2 for all n4.

Solution

The statement is true for n=4 since 12<16. Suppose next that 3k<2k for some kN, k4. Now,

3(k+1)=3k+3<2k+3<2k+2k=2k+1,

where the second inequality follows since k4 and, so, 2k16>3. This shows that P(k+1) is true. Thus, by the generalized principle of induction, the inequality holds for all n4.

Next we present another variant of the induction principle which makes it easier to prove the inductive step. Despite its name, this principle is equivalent to the standard one.

Theorem 1.3.3 - Principle of Strong Induction.

For each natural nN, suppose that P(n) denotes a proposition which is either true or false. Let A={nN:P(n) is true }. Suppose the following two conditions hold:

  1. 1A.
  2. For each kN, if 1,2,,kA, then k+1A

Then A=N.

Proof

Add proof here and it will automatically be hidden

Remark 1.3.4

Note that the inductive step above says that, in order to prove P(k+1) is true, we may assume not only that P(k) is true, but also that P(1),P(2),,P(k1) are true.

There is also a generalized version of this theorem where the base case is for some integer n0>1.

Example 1.3.5

Prove by induction that every positive integer greater than 1 is either a prime number or a product of prime numbers.

Solution

Clearly, the statement is true for n=2. Suppose the statement holds for any positive integer m{2,,k}, where kN, k2. If k+1 is prime, the statement holds for k+1. Otherwise, there are positive integers p,q>1 such that k+1=pq. Since p,qk, by the inductive assumption applied to both p and q we can find prime numbers r1,,r and s1,,sm such that p=r1r and q=s1sm (note that and m may both equal 1). But then

k+1=r1rs1sm

Thus, the statement holds true for k+1. The conclusion now follows by the principle of Strong Induction.

Exercise 1.3.1

Prove the following using Mathematical Induction.

  1. 12+22++n2=n(n+1)(2n+1)6 for all nN.
  2. 13+23++n3=n2(n+1)24 for all nN.
  3. 1+3++(2n1)=n2 for all nN.
Answer

Add texts here. Do not delete this text first.

Exercise 1.3.2

Prove that for all nN, 9n5n is divisible by 4.

Answer

Add texts here. Do not delete this text first.

Exercise 1.3.3

Prove that for all nN, 7n1 is divisible by 3

Answer

Add texts here. Do not delete this text first.

Example 1.3.4

Prove the following using induction.

  1. 2n+12n for n3 (nN).
  2. n23n for all nN. (Hint: show first that for all nN, 2nn2+1. This does not require induction..)
  3. n33n for all nN. (Hint: Check the cases n=1 and n=2 directly and then use induction for n3.)

Solution

Add text here.

Exercise 1.3.5

Given a real number a1, prove that

1+a+a2++an=1an+11a for all nN.

Answer

Add texts here. Do not delete this text first.

Exercise 1.3.6

The Fibonacci sequence is defined by

a1=a2=1 and an+2=an+1+an for n1.

Prove

an=15[(1+52)n(152)n].

Answer

Add texts here. Do not delete this text first.

Exercise 1.3.7

Let a1. Prove by induction that

(1+a)n1+na for all nN.

Answer

Add texts here. Do not delete this text first.

Exercise 1.3.8

Let a,bR and nN. Use Mathematical Induction to prove the binomial theorem

(a+b)n=nk=0(nk)akbnk,

where (nk)=n!k!(nk)!.

Answer

Add texts here. Do not delete this text first.


This page titled 1.3: The Natural Numbers and Mathematical Induction is shared under a CC BY-NC-SA license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Lafferriere, Lafferriere, and Nguyen (PDXOpen: Open Educational Resources) .

Support Center

How can we help?