Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js
Skip to main content
Library homepage
 

Text Color

Text Size

 

Margin Size

 

Font Type

Enable Dyslexic Font
Mathematics LibreTexts

5.8: Rectifiable Arcs. Absolute Continuity

This page is a draft and is under active development. 

( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

If a function f:E1E is of bounded variation (§7) on an interval I=[a,b], we can define a real function vf on I by

vf(x)=Vf[a,x](= total variation of f on [a,x]) for xI;

vf is called the total variation function, or length function, generated by f on I. Note that vf on I. (Why?) We now consider the case where f is also relatively continuous on I, so that the set A=f[I] is a rectifiable arc (see §7, Note 1 and Definition 2).

Definition 1

A function f:E1E is (weakly) absolutely continuous on I=[a,b] iff Vf[I]<+ and f is relatively continuous on I.

Theorem 5.8.1

The following are equivalent:

(i) f is (weakly) absolutely continuous on I=[a,b];

(ii) vf is finite and relatively continuous on I; and

(iii) (ε>0) (δ>0) (x,yI|0yx<δ) Vf[x,y]<ε.

Proof

We shall show that (ii) (iii) (i) (ii).

(ii) (iii). As I=[a,b] is compact, (ii) implies that vf is uniformly continuous on I (Theorem 4 of Chapter 4, §8). Thus

(ε>0) (δ>0) (x,yI|0yx<δ)vf(y)vf(x)<ε.

However,

vf(y)vf(x)=Vf[a,y]Vf[a,x]=Vf[x,y]

by additivity (Theorem 1 in §7). Thus (iii) follows.

(iii) (i). By Corollary 3 of §7, |f(x)f(y)|Vf[x,y]. Therefore, (iii) implies that

(ε>0) (δ>0) (x,yI||xy|<δ)|f(x)f(y)|<ε,

and so f is relatively (even uniformly) continuous on I.

Now with ε and δ as in (iii), take a partition P={t0,,tm} of I so fine that

titi1<δ,i=1,2,, m.

Then (i)Vf[ti1,ti]<ε. Adding up these m inequalities and using the additivity of Vf, we obtain

Vf[I]=mi=1Vf[ti1,ti]<mε<+.

Thus (i) follows, by definition.

That (i) (ii) is given as the next theorem.

Theorem 5.8.2

If Vf[I]<+ and if f is relatively continuous at some pI (over I=[a,b]), then the same applies to the length function vf.

Proof

We consider left continuity first, with a<pb.

Let ε>0. By assumption, there is δ>0 such that

|f(x)f(p)|<ε2 when |xp|<δ and x[a,p].

Fix any such x. Also, Vf[a,p]=supPS(f,P) over [a,p]. Thus

Vf[a,p]ε2<ki=1|Δif|

for some partition

P={t0=a,,tk1,tk=p} of [a,p]. (Why?)

We may assume tk1=x,x as above. (If tk1x, add x to P.) Then

|Δkf|=|f(p)f(x)|<ε2,

and hence

Vf[a,p]ε2<k1i=1|Δif|+|Δkf|<k1i=1|Δif|+ε2Vf[a,tk1]+ε2.

However,

Vf[a,p]=vf(p)

and

Vf[a,tk1]=Vf[a,x]=vf(x).

Thus (1) yields

|vf(p)vf(x)|=Vf[a,p]Vf[a,x]<ε for x[a,p] with |xp|<δ.

This shows that vf is left continuous at p.

Right continuity is proved similarly on noting that

vf(x)vf(p)=Vf[p,b]Vf[x,b] for px<b. (Why?)

Thus vf is, indeed, relatively continuous at p. Observe that vf is also of bounded variation on I, being monotone and finite (see Theorem 3(ii) of §7).

This completes the proof of both Theorem 2 and Theorem 1.

We also have the following.

Corollary 5.8.1

If f is real and absolutely continuous on I=[a,b] (weakly), so are the nondecreasing functions g and h(f=gh) defined in Theorem 3 of §7.

Indeed, the function g as defined there is simply vf. Thus it is relatively continuous and finite on I by Theorem 1. Hence so also is h=fg. Both are of bounded variation (monotone!) and hence absolutely continuous (weakly).

Note 1. The proof of Theorem 1 shows that (weak) absolute continuity implies uniform continuity. The converse fails, however (see Problem 1(iv) in §7).

We now apply our theory to antiderivatives (integrals).

Corollary 5.8.2

If F=f on I=[a,b] and if f is bounded (|f|KE1) on IQ (Q countable), then F is weakly absolutely continuous on I.

(Actually, even the stronger variety of absolute continuity follows. See Chapter 7, §11, Problem 17).

Proof

By definition, F=f is finite and relatively continuous on I, so we only have to show that VF[I]<+. This, however, easily follows by Problem 3 of §7 on noting that F=f on IS (S countable). Details are left to the reader.

Our next theorem expresses arc length in the form of an integral.

Theorem 5.8.3

If f:E1E is continuously differentiable on I=[a,b] (§6), then vf=|f| on I and

Vf[a,b]=ba|f|.

Proof

Let a<p<xb,Δx=xp, and

Δvf=vf(x)vf(p)=Vf[p,x].(Why?)

As a first step, we shall show that

ΔvfΔxsup[p,x]|f|.

For any partition P={p=t0,,tm=x} of [p,x], we have

S(f,P)=mi=1|Δif|mi=1sup[ti1,ti]|f|(titi1)sup[p,x]|f|Δx.

Since this holds for any partition P, we have

Vf[p,x]sup[p,x]|f|Δx,

which implies (2).

On the other hand,

Δvf=Vf[p,x]|f(x)f(p)|=|Δf|.

Combining, we get

|ΔfΔx|ΔvfΔxsup[p,x]|f|<+

since f is relatively continuous on [a,b], hence also uniformly continuous and bounded. (Here we assumed a<p<xb. However, (3) holds also if ax<p<b, with Δvf=V[x,p] and Δx<0. Verify!)

Now

||f(p)||f(x)|||f(p)f(x)|0 as xp,

so, taking limits as xp, we obtain

limxpΔvfΔx=|f(p)|.

Thus vf is differentiable at each p in (a,b), with vf(p)=|f(p)|. Also, vf is relatively continuous and finite on [a,b] (by Theorem 1). Hence vf=|f| on [a,b], and we obtain

ba|f|=vf(b)vf(a)=Vf[a,b], as asserted.

Note 2. If the range space E is En (*or Cn), f has n components

f1,f2,,fn.

By Theorem 5 in §1, f=(f1,f2,,fn), so

|f|=nk=1|fk|2,

and we get

Vf[a,b]=bank=1|fk|2=bank=1|fk(t)|2dt(classical notation).

In particular, for complex functions, we have (see Chapter 4, §3, Note 5)

Vf[a,b]=bafre(t)2+fim(t)2dt.

In practice, formula (5) is used when a curve is given parametrically by

xk=fk(t),k=1,2,, n,

with the fk differentiable on [a,b]. Curves in E2 are often given in nonparametric form as

y=F(x),F:E1E1.

Here F[I] is not the desired curve but simply a set in E1. To apply (5) here, we first replace "y=F(x)" by suitable parametric equations,

x=f1(t) and y=f2(t);

i.e., we introduce a function f:E1E, with f=(f1,f2). An obvious (but not the only) way of achieving it is to set

x=f1(t)=t and y=f2(t)=F(t)

so that f1=1 and f2=F. Then formula (5) may be written as

Vf[a,b]=ba1+F(x)2dx,f(x)=(x,F(x)).

Example

Find the length of the circle

x2+y2=r2.

Here it is convenient to use the parametric equations

x=rcost and y=rsint,

i.e., to define f:E1E2 by

f(t)=(rcost,rsint),

or, in complex notation,

f(t)=reti.

Then the circle is obtained by letting t vary through [0,2π]. Thus (5) yields

Vf[0,2π]=barcos2t+sin2tdt=rba1dt=rt|2π0=2rπ.

Note that f describes the same circle A=f[I] over I=[0,4π]. More generally, we could let t vary through any interval [a,b] with ba2π. However, the length, Vf[a,b], would change (depending on ba). This is because the circle A=f[I] is not a simple arc (see §7, Note 1), so A depends on f and I, and one must be careful in selecting both appropriately.


This page titled 5.8: Rectifiable Arcs. Absolute Continuity is shared under a CC BY 3.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Elias Zakon (The Trilla Group (support by Saylor Foundation)) via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform.

Support Center

How can we help?