Skip to main content
Mathematics LibreTexts

1.9: Common Mistakes Math Teachers Make

  • Page ID
    163188
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)

    Chapter 5: Common Pitfalls in Elementary Math Instruction

    Mathematics education in elementary school is the bedrock upon which a student's future mathematical understanding and success are built. It's a critical period where young minds are introduced to foundational concepts that will shape their relationship with numbers and problem-solving for years to come. However, even the most dedicated and well-intentioned teachers can inadvertently fall into common traps that may hinder their students' progress and enthusiasm for mathematics.

    In this chapter, we'll explore five frequent mistakes made in elementary math instruction. By identifying these pitfalls and understanding their impact, educators can take proactive steps to avoid them. More importantly, we'll provide practical strategies to overcome these challenges, ensuring that students receive a robust and engaging mathematical education that prepares them for future academic and real-world success.

    1. Prioritizing Procedure Over Concept

    One of the most pervasive issues in math education is the tendency to focus on teaching procedures rather than fostering conceptual understanding. While procedures are undoubtedly important, students who only learn the "how" without grasping the "why" often struggle to apply their knowledge flexibly or to more advanced concepts.

    This approach, often referred to as "algorithmic teaching," can lead to several problems:

    • Students may be able to solve problems in familiar formats but struggle when presented with the same concept in a different context.
    • Learners might memorize steps without understanding the underlying mathematical principles, leading to difficulties in more advanced math courses.
    • It can foster a belief that mathematics is about following rules rather than understanding and reasoning, potentially diminishing students' interest and confidence in the subject.

    Solution:

    To address this issue, teachers should strive to unpack each standard to identify the core concepts. Use manipulatives and visual representations to build a concrete understanding before moving to abstract procedures. This approach, often referred to as the Concrete-Representational-Abstract (CRA) sequence, allows students to develop a solid conceptual foundation.

    Example: Teaching Number Comparison

    Instead of immediately introducing the greater than (>) and less than (<) symbols, start with physical objects:

    1. Have students create two piles of objects (e.g., 8 blocks and 6 blocks).
    2. Ask them to visually compare the piles and discuss which has more or less.
    3. Introduce number lines as a representational tool, showing how the numbers' positions relate to their values.
    4. Finally, introduce the symbols as a shorthand for expressing these comparisons.

    This progression ensures students understand what these symbols truly represent, rather than just memorizing a rule about which way the "alligator mouth" points.

    2. Insufficient Exploration Time

    In the face of packed curricula and standardized testing pressures, teachers often feel compelled to rush through material, leaving limited time for hands-on exploration. This haste can result in superficial understanding and difficulty in applying concepts to new situations.

    The consequences of insufficient exploration time include:

    • Students may develop a fragile understanding that quickly fades after the unit is completed.
    • Learners might struggle to see connections between different mathematical concepts.
    • It can lead to math anxiety, as students feel pressured to quickly grasp ideas without adequate time to process and internalize them.

    Solution:

    Implement the Concrete-Representational-Abstract (CRA) framework rigorously. Ensure students have ample time to explore concepts with manipulatives before progressing to pictorial representations and abstract symbols. This might mean spending more time on fewer topics, but with deeper understanding.

    Example: Teaching Fractions

    A comprehensive exploration of fractions might look like this:

    1. Concrete: Use fraction circles or bars to physically represent fractions. Have students manipulate these to compare, add, and subtract fractions.
    2. Representational: Move to drawing fraction models, encouraging students to create visual representations of fraction problems.
    3. Abstract: Introduce fraction notation and algorithms for operations, constantly referring back to the concrete and representational understandings.

    This process might take longer, but it builds a robust understanding that serves students well in future mathematical endeavors.

    3. Overloading with Strategies

    In an admirable effort to cater to different learning styles and provide a toolkit for problem-solving, teachers sometimes introduce too many strategies simultaneously. This approach, while well-intentioned, can overwhelm students and prevent mastery of any single approach.

    The pitfalls of strategy overload include:

    • Students may become confused about which strategy to use when, leading to indecision and lack of confidence.
    • Learners might rely on less efficient strategies because they haven't had time to fully understand and practice more sophisticated ones.
    • It can create the misconception that there's always a "trick" to solving math problems, rather than encouraging deep thinking and problem-solving skills.

    Solution:

    Introduce strategies sequentially, allowing several days of practice for each. This gives students time to understand and internalize each method before moving on to the next. Focus on strategies that are most broadly applicable and build on each other.

    Example: Teaching Addition Strategies

    Instead of introducing all strategies at once, consider this sequence:

    1. Start with counting on, using number lines and hundred charts for support.
    2. Introduce doubles facts (2+2, 3+3, etc.) and practice until fluent.
    3. Teach "doubles plus one" (7+8 as double 7 plus 1 more).
    4. Move to making tens (9+6 as 9+1+5).
    5. Finally, introduce the standard algorithm, showing how it relates to the previous strategies.

    Spend several days on each strategy, ensuring students are comfortable before moving on. Regularly revisit previous strategies to maintain skills.

    4. Neglecting Math Talks

    Math talks—structured classroom discussions about mathematical thinking—are often overlooked in the rush to cover content. Yet, they are crucial for developing number sense, mathematical communication skills, and flexible thinking.

    The consequences of neglecting math talks include:

    • Students may develop the idea that math is about silent, individual work rather than collaborative problem-solving.
    • Learners might struggle to articulate their mathematical thinking, hindering their ability to self-reflect and learn from others.
    • Teachers miss valuable opportunities to assess student understanding and address misconceptions in real-time.

    Solution:

    Incorporate regular math talks into your routine. Use open-ended questions to encourage students to explain their reasoning and consider alternative approaches. Make math talks a daily practice, even if only for 5-10 minutes.

    Example: Implementing Math Talks

    Here's a simple structure for daily math talks:

    1. Present a problem or number sentence (e.g., 25 + 18 = __).
    2. Give students think time to solve mentally.
    3. Ask for answers (but don't confirm correctness yet).
    4. Call on students to share their strategies, encouraging multiple approaches.
    5. Facilitate discussion about the efficiency and applicability of different strategies.
    6. Summarize the key mathematical ideas that emerged from the discussion.

    This routine not only improves mathematical thinking but also builds a classroom culture where mathematical discourse is valued and expected.

    5. Losing Sight of Real-World Applications

    When focused on skill acquisition and test preparation, it's easy to forget the practical applications of math in daily life. This disconnect can reduce student engagement and understanding, leading to the common question: "When will I ever use this in real life?"

    The pitfalls of neglecting real-world applications include:

    • Students may see math as an isolated subject, disconnected from their lives and interests.
    • Learners might struggle to apply mathematical concepts to practical situations outside the classroom.
    • It can diminish motivation and interest in mathematics, particularly for students who are more practically oriented.

    Solution:

    Regularly incorporate real-life scenarios and word problems that demonstrate the relevance of the math skills being taught. Look for opportunities to connect math to other subjects and to students' personal interests.

    Example: Integrating Real-World Math

    Here are some ways to bring real-world math into your classroom:

    • Use actual flyers and catalogs for price comparison and percentage discount calculations.
    • Create a class store or economy system to practice money skills and basic operations.
    • Incorporate measurement into a class cooking project, scaling recipes up or down.
    • Use sports statistics to explore data analysis and probability.
    • Plan a hypothetical class trip, calculating distances, times, and budgets.

    These activities not only make math more engaging but also help students see its relevance and importance in their daily lives.

    By addressing these common pitfalls, elementary math teachers can create a more effective and engaging learning environment. Remember, the goal is not just to teach math, but to develop mathematical thinkers who can apply their skills confidently in various contexts.

    Implementing these solutions may require adjustments to your teaching approach and possibly your curriculum pacing. However, the benefits—deeper understanding, increased engagement, and better long-term retention of mathematical concepts—far outweigh the challenges.

    As you move forward, continually reflect on your teaching practices. Are you providing enough concrete experiences? Are your students getting opportunities to discuss their mathematical thinking? Are they seeing the connections between classroom math and the world around them? By keeping these questions in mind and actively working to avoid th


    1.9: Common Mistakes Math Teachers Make is shared under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by LibreTexts.

    • Was this article helpful?