Loading [MathJax]/extensions/mml2jax.js
Skip to main content
Library homepage
 

Text Color

Text Size

 

Margin Size

 

Font Type

Enable Dyslexic Font
Mathematics LibreTexts

Search

  • Filter Results
  • Location
  • Classification
    • Article type
    • Stage
    • Author
    • Cover Page
    • License
    • Show Page TOC
    • Transcluded
    • PrintOptions
    • OER program or Publisher
    • Autonumber Section Headings
    • License Version
    • Print CSS
    • Screen CSS
    • Number of Print Columns
  • Include attachments
Searching in
About 4 results
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Courses/American_River_College/Math_300%3A_My_Math_Ideas_Textbook_(Kinoshita)/02%3A_Voting_Theory_and_Apportionment/2.02%3A_Apportionment/2.2.05%3A_Huntington-Hill_Method
    In 1920, no new apportionment was done, because Congress couldn’t agree on the method to be used. They appointed a committee of mathematicians to investigate, and they recommended the Huntington-Hill ...In 1920, no new apportionment was done, because Congress couldn’t agree on the method to be used. They appointed a committee of mathematicians to investigate, and they recommended the Huntington-Hill Method. They continued to use Webster’s method in 1931, but after a second report recommending Huntington-Hill, it was adopted in 1941 and is the current method of apportionment used in Congress.
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Courses/Cosumnes_River_College/Math_300%3A_Mathematical_Ideas_Textbook_(Muranaka)/01%3A_Apportionment/1.00%3A_Apportionment/1.0.04%3A_Huntington-Hill_Method
    In 1920, no new apportionment was done, because Congress couldn’t agree on the method to be used. They appointed a committee of mathematicians to investigate, and they recommended the Huntington-Hill ...In 1920, no new apportionment was done, because Congress couldn’t agree on the method to be used. They appointed a committee of mathematicians to investigate, and they recommended the Huntington-Hill Method. They continued to use Webster’s method in 1931, but after a second report recommending Huntington-Hill, it was adopted in 1941 and is the current method of apportionment used in Congress.
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Applied_Mathematics/Math_in_Society_(Lippman)/04%3A_Apportionment/4.05%3A_Huntington-Hill_Method
    In 1920, no new apportionment was done, because Congress couldn’t agree on the method to be used. They appointed a committee of mathematicians to investigate, and they recommended the Huntington-Hill ...In 1920, no new apportionment was done, because Congress couldn’t agree on the method to be used. They appointed a committee of mathematicians to investigate, and they recommended the Huntington-Hill Method. They continued to use Webster’s method in 1931, but after a second report recommending Huntington-Hill, it was adopted in 1941 and is the current method of apportionment used in Congress.
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Courses/Las_Positas_College/Math_for_Liberal_Arts/10%3A_Apportionment/10.02%3A_Huntington-Hill_Method
    State X has a population of 750 and 1 representative so the calculation for the Huntington-Hill number for State X is: \[\begin{align}\frac{750^2}{1\times 2}\end{align}\] \text { Current Representatio...State X has a population of 750 and 1 representative so the calculation for the Huntington-Hill number for State X is: \[\begin{align}\frac{750^2}{1\times 2}\end{align}\] \text { Current Representation } & \text { State X } & \text{ State Y } & \text{ State Z } \\ Step 6) The representatives were assigned in order to State X, Y, Z, X, X, Z, X, Y, X. The final allocation is State X has 5 representatives, State Y has 2 representatives, and State Z has 2 representatives.

Support Center

How can we help?