Loading [MathJax]/jax/element/mml/optable/BasicLatin.js
Skip to main content
Library homepage
 

Text Color

Text Size

 

Margin Size

 

Font Type

Enable Dyslexic Font
Mathematics LibreTexts

Search

  • Filter Results
  • Location
  • Classification
    • Article type
    • Stage
    • Author
    • Embed Hypothes.is?
    • Cover Page
    • License
    • Show Page TOC
    • Transcluded
    • PrintOptions
    • OER program or Publisher
    • Autonumber Section Headings
    • License Version
    • Print CSS
    • Screen CSS
  • Include attachments
Searching in
About 40 results
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Combinatorics_and_Discrete_Mathematics/Elementary_Number_Theory_(Clark)/01%3A_Chapters/1.16%3A_Divisibility_Tests_for_2_3_5_9_11
    Recall from Definition 4.2 that the decimal representation of the positive integer a is given by a=an1an2a1a0 when \[a=a_{n-1}10^{n-1}+a_{n-2}10^{n-2}+\dotsb+a_1...Recall from Definition 4.2 that the decimal representation of the positive integer a is given by \boldsymbol{\label{eq:1} a=a_{n-1}a_{n-2}\dotsm a_1a_0} when a=an110n1+an210n2++a110+a0 and 0ai9 for i=0,1,,n1.
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Combinatorics_and_Discrete_Mathematics/Elementary_Number_Theory_(Clark)/01%3A_Chapters/1.14%3A_Perfect_Numbers_and_Mersenne_Primes
    Since q is odd, gcd, so by Lemmas 13.1 and 13.2: \sigma(n)=\sigma(2^k)\sigma(q)=(2^{k+1}-1)\sigma(q).\nonumber So we have \[2^{k+1}q=2n=\sigma(n)=(2^{k+1}-1)\sigma(q),\nonumber ...Since q is odd, \gcd(2^k,q)=1, so by Lemmas 13.1 and 13.2: \sigma(n)=\sigma(2^k)\sigma(q)=(2^{k+1}-1)\sigma(q).\nonumber So we have 2^{k+1}q=2n=\sigma(n)=(2^{k+1}-1)\sigma(q),\nonumber hence \label{eq:2} 2^{k+1}q=(2^{k+1}-1)\sigma(q). Now \sigma^\ast(q)=\sigma(q)-q, so \sigma(q)=\sigma^\ast(q)+q.\nonumber Putting this in \eqref{eq:2} we get 2^{k+1}q=(2^{k+1}-1)(\sigma^\ast(q)+q)\nonumber or 2^{k+1}q=(2^{k+1}-1)\sigma^\ast(q)+2^{k+1}q-q\nonumber whic…
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Combinatorics_and_Discrete_Mathematics/Elementary_Number_Theory_(Clark)/01%3A_Chapters/1.22%3A_The_Groups_Um
    A residue class [a]\in\mathbb{Z}_m is called a unit if there is another residue class [b]\in\mathbb{Z}_m such that [a][b]=[1]. The set of all units in \mathbb{Z}_m is denoted by \(U_m\...A residue class [a]\in\mathbb{Z}_m is called a unit if there is another residue class [b]\in\mathbb{Z}_m such that [a][b]=[1]. The set of all units in \mathbb{Z}_m is denoted by U_m and is called the group of units of \mathbb{Z}_m. Note that if b\in B and \gcd\left(b,p^n\right)=d>1, then d is a factor of p^n and d>1 so d has p as a factor.
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Combinatorics_and_Discrete_Mathematics/Elementary_Number_Theory_(Clark)/01%3A_Chapters/1.27%3A_The_RSA_Scheme
    Now by Fermat’s Little Theorem, if \gcd(x,p)=1 we have x^{p-1}\equiv 1\pmod p and raising both sides of the congruence to the power (q-1)k we obtain: \[x^{(p-1)(q-1)k}\equiv 1\pmod p\nonum...Now by Fermat’s Little Theorem, if \gcd(x,p)=1 we have x^{p-1}\equiv 1\pmod p and raising both sides of the congruence to the power (q-1)k we obtain: x^{(p-1)(q-1)k}\equiv 1\pmod p\nonumber and multiplying both sides by x we have x^{(p-1)(q-1)k+1}\equiv x\pmod p\nonumber That is, by \eqref{eq:1} \label{eq:2} x^{ed}\equiv x\pmod p. Now we proved \eqref{eq:2} when \gcd(x,p)=1, but if \gcd(x,p)=p it is obvious since then x\equiv 0\pmod p.
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Combinatorics_and_Discrete_Mathematics/Elementary_Number_Theory_(Clark)/01%3A_Chapters/1.02%3A_Proof_by_Induction
    Prove that if a and r are real numbers and r\neq 1, then for n \ge 1 a+ar+ar^2+\cdots +ar^n=\dfrac{a\left( r^{n+1}-1\right)}{r-1}.\nonumber This can be written as follows \[a(r^{n+...Prove that if a and r are real numbers and r\neq 1, then for n \ge 1 a+ar+ar^2+\cdots +ar^n=\dfrac{a\left( r^{n+1}-1\right)}{r-1}.\nonumber This can be written as follows a(r^{n+1}-1) = (r-1)(a+ar+ar^2+\cdots +ar^n).\nonumber And important special case of which is (r^{n+1}-1) = (r-1)(1+r+r^2+\cdots +r^n).\nonumber
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Combinatorics_and_Discrete_Mathematics/Elementary_Number_Theory_(Clark)/01%3A_Chapters/1.23%3A_Two_Theorems_of_Euler_and_Fermat
    If [a]\in U_m define [a]^1=[a] and for n>1, [a]^n=[a][a]\dotsm[a] where there are n copies of [a] on the right. If [a]\in U_m, then [a]^n\in U_m for n\ge 1 and \([a...If [a]\in U_m define [a]^1=[a] and for n>1, [a]^n=[a][a]\dotsm[a] where there are n copies of [a] on the right. If [a]\in U_m, then [a]^n\in U_m for n\ge 1 and [a]^n=[a^n]. Then \begin{split} [a]^{k+1} &=[a]^k[a] \\ &=\left[a^k\right][a]\quad\text{by the induction hypothesis} \\ &=\left[a^ka\right]\quad\text{by Definition 21.1} \\ &=\left[a^{k+1}\right]\quad\text{since }a^ka=a^{k+1}. \end{split} So by the PMI, the theorem holds for n\ge 1.
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Combinatorics_and_Discrete_Mathematics/Elementary_Number_Theory_(Clark)/01%3A_Chapters/1.09%3A_Blankinship's_Method
    Let’s now consider a more complicated example: Take a=1876, b=365. \begin{bmatrix} 1876 & 1 & 0 \\ 365 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\nonumber Now 1876=365\cdot5+51 so we add -5 times the s...Let’s now consider a more complicated example: Take a=1876, b=365. \begin{bmatrix} 1876 & 1 & 0 \\ 365 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\nonumber Now 1876=365\cdot5+51 so we add -5 times the second row to the first row, getting: \begin{bmatrix} 51 & 1 & -5 \\ 365 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\nonumber Now 365=51\cdot7+8, so we add -7 times row 1 to row 2, getting: \begin{bmatrix} 51 & 1 & -5 \\ 8 & -7 & 36 \end{bmatrix}\nonumber Now 51=8\cdot 6+3, so we add -6 ti…
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Combinatorics_and_Discrete_Mathematics/Elementary_Number_Theory_(Clark)/01%3A_Chapters/1.01%3A_Basic_Axioms_for_Z
    If a, b\in\mathbb{Z} and ab=1, then either a=b=1 or a=b=-1. (Trichotomy) Given a and b, one and only one of the following holds: a=b , \quad a<b , \quad b<a.\nonumber
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Combinatorics_and_Discrete_Mathematics/Elementary_Number_Theory_(Clark)/01%3A_Chapters/1.15%3A_Congruences
    Let r=a\bmod m=b\bmod m, then by definition we have a=mq_1+r,\quad 0\le r<m,\nonumber and b=mq_2+r,\quad 0\le r<m.\nonumber Hence a-b=m\left(q_1-q_2\right).\nonumber This shows that...Let r=a\bmod m=b\bmod m, then by definition we have a=mq_1+r,\quad 0\le r<m,\nonumber and b=mq_2+r,\quad 0\le r<m.\nonumber Hence a-b=m\left(q_1-q_2\right).\nonumber This shows that m\mid a-b and hence a\equiv b\pmod m, as desired.
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Combinatorics_and_Discrete_Mathematics/Elementary_Number_Theory_(Clark)/zz%3A_Back_Matter/02%3A_Glossary
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Combinatorics_and_Discrete_Mathematics/Elementary_Number_Theory_(Clark)/01%3A_Chapters/1.24%3A_Probabilistic_Primality_Tests
    Thus, if 2<m\le 10^{10} and m satisfies 2^{m-1}\equiv 1\pmod m, the probability m is prime is \frac{455,052,511}{455,052,511+14,884}\approx .999967292.\nonumber In other words, if...Thus, if 2<m\le 10^{10} and m satisfies 2^{m-1}\equiv 1\pmod m, the probability m is prime is \frac{455,052,511}{455,052,511+14,884}\approx .999967292.\nonumber In other words, if you find that 2^{m-1}\equiv 1\pmod m, then it is highly likely (but not a certainty) that m is prime, at least when m\le 10^{10}. If m>10^6 and a^{m-1}\equiv 1\pmod m for a \in \{2,3,5,7,11,17,19,31,37,41\}, it is highly likely, but not certain, that m is prime.

Support Center

How can we help?