0.2: Relations

Definition: Binary Relation

Let \(S\) be a nonempty set. Then any subset \(R\) of \(S \times S\) is said to be a relation over \(S\). In other words, a relation is a rule defined between two elements of \(S\). Intuitively, if \(R\) is a relation over \(S\), then the statement \(a R b\) is either true or false for all \(a,b\in S\).

If the statement \(a R b\) is false, we denote this by \( a \not R b\).

Example \(\PageIndex{1}\):

Let \(S=\{1,2,3\}\). Define \(R\) by \(a R b\) if and only if \(a < b\), for \(a, b \in S\).

Then \(1 R 2, 1 R 3, 2 R 3 \) and \( 2 \not R 1\).

We can visualize the above binary relation as a graph, where the vertices are the elements of S, and there is an edge from \(a\) to \(b\) if and only if \(a R b\), for \(a b\in S\).

Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\): Relation as a graph. (Copyright: Pamini Thangarajah)

The following are some examples of relations defined on \(\mathbb{Z}\).

Example \(\PageIndex{2}\):

1. Define \(R\) by \(a R b\) if and only if \(a < b\), for \(a, b \in \mathbb{Z}\).
2. Define \(R\) by \(a R b\) if and only if \(a >b\), for \(a, b \in \mathbb{Z}\).
3. Define \(R\) by \(a R b\) if and only if \(a \leq b\), for \(a, b \in \mathbb{Z}\).
4. Define \(R\) by \(a R b\) if and only if \(a \geq b\), for \(a, b \in \mathbb{Z}\).
5. Define \(R\) by \(a R b\) if and only if \(a = b\), for \(a, b \in \mathbb{Z}\).

Definition: Divisor/Divides

Let \( a\) and \(b\) be integers. We say that \(a\) divides \(b\) is denoted \(a\mid b\), provided we have an integer \(m\) such that \(b=am\). In this case we can also say the following:

• \(b\) is divisible by \(a\)
• \(a\) is a factor of \(b\)
• \(a\) is a divisor of \(b\)
• \(b\) is a multiple of \(a\) 

If \(a\) does not divide \(b\), then it is  is denoted by \(a \not \mid b\).

Theorem \(\PageIndex{1}\): Divisibility inequality theorem

If \(a\mid b\), for \(a, b \in \mathbb{Z_+}\) then \(a \leq b\),

Proof

Let \(a, b \in \mathbb{Z_+}\) such that \(a\mid b\), Since (a\mid b\), there is a positive integer \(m\) such that \(b=am\). Since \(m \geq 1\) and \(a\) is a positive integer, \(b=am \geq (a)(1)=a. \)

Note that if \(a\mid b\), for \(a, b \in \mathbb{Z_+}\) then \(a \leq b\), but the converse is not true. For example: \(2 <3\), but \(2 \not\mid 3\).

Example \(\PageIndex{6}\):

According to our definition, \(0 \mid 0\).

Definition: Even integer

An integer is even provided that it is divisible by \(2\).

Properties of binary relation:

Definition: Reflexive

Let \(S\) be a set and \(R\) be a binary relation on \(S\). Then \(R\) is said to be reflexive if \( a R a, \forall a \in S.\)

 

We will follow the template below to answer the question about reflexive.

Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\): Reflexive.

Example \(\PageIndex{7}\):

Define \(R\) by \(a R b\) if and only if \(a < b\), for \(a, b \in \mathbb{Z}\). Is \(R\) reflexive?

Counterexample:

Choose \(a=2.\)

Since \( 2 \not< 2\), \(R\) is not reflexive.

Example \(\PageIndex{8}\):

Define \(R\) by \(a R b\) if and only if \(a \mid b\), for \(a, b \in \mathbb{Z}\). Is \(R\) reflexive?

Proof:

Let \( a \in \mathbb{Z}\). Since \(a=(1) (a)\), \(a \mid a\).

Thus \(R\) is reflexive. \( \Box\)

Definition: Symmetric

Let \(S\) be a set and \(R\) be a binary relation on \(S\). Then \(R\) is said to be symmetric if the following statement is true:

\( \forall a,b \in S\), if \( a R b \) then \(b R a\), in other words, \( \forall a,b \in S, a R b \implies b R a.\)

Example \(\PageIndex{9}\): Visually

\(\forall a,b \in S, a R b \implies b R a.\) holds!

We will follow the template below to answer the question about symmetry.

Figure \(\PageIndex{2}\): Symmetric. 

Example \(\PageIndex{10}\):

Define \(R\) by \(a R b\) if and only if \(a < b\), for \(a, b \in \mathbb{Z}\). Is \(R\) symmetric?

Counterexample:

\(1<2\) but \(2 \not < 1\).

Example \(\PageIndex{11}\):

Define \(R\) by \(a R b\) if and only if \(a \mid b\), for \(a, b \in \mathbb{Z}\). Is \(R\) symmetric?

Counterexample:

\(2 \mid 4\) but \(4 \not \mid 2\).

 

Definition: Transitive

Let \(S\) be a set and \(R\) be a binary relation on \(S\). Then \(R\) is said to be transitive if the following statement is true

\( \forall a,b,c \in S,\) if \( a R b \) and \(b R c\), then \(a R c\).

In other words, \( \forall a,b,c \in S\), \( a R b \wedge b R c \implies a R c\).

Example \(\PageIndex{12}\): VISUALLY

\( \forall a,b,c \in S\), \( a R b \wedge b R c \implies a R c\) holds!

We will follow the template below to answer the question about transitive.

Example \(\PageIndex{13}\):

Define \(R\) by \(a R b\) if and only if \(a < b\), for \(a, b \in \mathbb{Z}\). Is \(R\) transitive?

Example \(\PageIndex{14}\):

Define \(R\) by \(a R b\) if and only if \(a \mid b\), for \(a, b \in \mathbb{Z_+}\). Is \(R\) transitive?

 

Definition: Equivalence Relation

A binary relation is an equivalence relation on a nonempty set \(S\) if and only if it is reflexive (R), symmetric (S), and transitive (T).

: 

Definition: Antisymmetric

Let \(S\) be a set and \(R\) be a binary relation on \(S\). Then \(R\) is said to be antisymmetric if the following statement is true:

\( \forall a,b \in S\), if \( a R b \) and \(b R a\), then \(a=b\).

In other words, \( \forall a,b \in S\), \( a R b \wedge b R a \implies a=b.\)

Example \(\PageIndex{15}\): Visually

\( \forall a,b \in S\), \( a R b \wedge b R a \implies a=b \) holds!

We will follow the template below to answer the question about anti-symmetry.

 

Example \(\PageIndex{16}\): \(=\)

 

Let \(S=\mathbb{R}\) and \(R\) be =. Is the relation a) reflexive, b) symmetric, c) antisymmetric, d) transitive, e) an equivalence relation, f) a partial order?

Solution:

1. Yes, \(R \) is reflexive.

   Proof:

   Let \(a \in \mathbb{R} \).

   Then \(a=a \).

   Hence \(R \) is reflexive. \(\blacksquare \)

    

   Yes, \(R \) is symmetric.

   Proof:

   Let \((a,b) \in \mathbb{R}\)  such that \(a=b.\)

   Clearly \(b=a \).

   Hence \(R \) is symmetric. \(\blacksquare \)

    

Yes, \(R \) is antisymmetric.

Proof:

Let \(a,b \in \mathbb{R} \) s.t. \(a=b \) and \(b=a \). Then clearly \(a=b \; \forall a,b \in \mathbb{R} \). \(\blacksquare \)

 

Yes, \(R \) is transitive.

Proof:

Let \(a,b,c \in \mathbb{R} \) s.t. \(a=b \) and \(b=c \).

We shall show that \(aRc \).

Since \(a=b \) and \(b=c \) it follows that \(a=c \)

Thus \(aRc \). \(\blacksquare \)

 

Yes, \(R \) is an equivalence relation.

Proof:

Since \(R \) is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive, it is an equivalence relation.

 

Yes, \(R \) is a partial order.

Proof:

Since \(R\) is reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive, \(R\) is a partial order.

Example \(\PageIndex{17}\): Less than or equal to

Let \(S=\mathbb{R}\) and \(R\) be \(\leq\). Is the relation a) reflexive, b) symmetric, c) antisymmetric, d) transitive, e) an equivalence relation, f) a partial order?

Solution

1. Yes, is reflexive.

Proof:

We will show that is true.

Let that is .

Since , is reflexive.◻

2. No, is not symmetric.

Counterexample:

Let and which are both .

It is true that , but it is not true that .

Thus is not symmetric.◻

3. Yes, is antisymmetric.

Proof:

We will show that given and that .

Since , s.t. .

Further, since , , .

Then .

Thus, .

Since, , thus .◻

4. Yes, is transitive.

Proof:

We will show that given and  , then  .

Since , s.t. .

Further, since , , .

Then .

Since, , thus .◻

5. No, is not an equivalence relation on since it is not symmetric.

6. Yes, is a partial order on since it is reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive.

Definition: Equivalence Class

Given an equivalence relation \( R \) over a set \( S, \) for any \(a \in S \) the equivalence class of a is the set \( [a]_R =\{ b \in S \mid a R b \} \), that is
\([a]_R \) is the set of all elements of S that are related to \(a\).

Example \(\PageIndex{18}\): Equivalence relation

Define a relation such that two shapes are related if and only if they are the same color. Is this relation an equivalence relation?

Equivalence classes are:

Example \(\PageIndex{19}\):

Define a relation such that two shapes are related if and only if they are similar. Is this relation an equivalence relation?

Equivalence classes are:

Definition: Partition

Let \(A\) be a nonempty set. A partition of \(A\) is a set of nonempty pairwise disjoint sets whose union is A.

 

Note

For every equivalence relation over a nonempty set \(S\), \(S\) has a partition.

 

Theorem \(\PageIndex{2}\)

If \( \sim \) is an equivalence relation over a nonempty set \(S\). Then the set of all equivalence classes is denoted by \(\{[a]_{\sim}| a \in S\}\) forms a partition of \(S\).

This means

1. Either \([a] \cap [b] = \emptyset\) or \([a]=[b]\), for all \(a,b\in S\).

2. \(S= \cup_{a \in S} [a]\).

Proof

Assume is an equivalence relation on a nonempty set .

Let . If , then we are done. Otherwise,

assume .

Let be the common element between them.

Let .

Then and , which means that and .

Since is an equivalence relation and .

Since and (due to the transitive property), .

Thus and .

Hence .

Next, we will show that .

First, we shall show that .

Let .

Then exists and .

Hence .

Thus .

Conversely, we shall show that .

Let .

Then for some .

Thus ∴ .

Thus .

Since and , then .◻

 

 

For the following examples, determine whether or not each of the following binary relations on the given set is reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, or transitive. If a relation has a certain property, prove this is so; otherwise, provide a counterexample to show that it does not. If is an equivalence relation, describe the equivalence classes of \(A\).

Example \(\PageIndex{20}\):

Let \(S = \{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9\}\). Define a relation \(R\) on \(A = S \times S \) by \((a, b) R (c, d)\)  if and only if \(10a + b \leq 10c + d.\) 

 

Solution

1. is reflexive on .

Proof:

Let .

We will show that .

Since , then .

Since is reflexive on .◻

2. is not symmetric on .

Counterexample:

Let .

Note that  , specifically , is true.

However, , is false.

Since , is not symmetric on .◻

3. is antisymmetric on .

Proof:

Let s.t. and .

Since and , .

We will show that and .

by definition.

Since and , thus .

Since , .

Thus is antisymmetric on .◻​​​​

5. is transitive on .

Proof:

Let s.t. and .

We will show that .

Since , .

Thus is transitive on .◻

6. is not an equivalence relation since it is not reflexive, symmetric, or transitive.

Example \(\PageIndex{21}\):

Let . Define a relation on , by if and only if

Solution

1. is reflexive on .

Proof:

Let  . We will show that .

Clearly,  since and a negative integer multiplied by a negative integer is a positive integer in .

Since , is reflexive on .◻​​​​​

 

2. is symmetric on .

Proof:

We will show that if , then .

Let s.t. , that is .

Since , .

Since , is symmetric on .◻

3. is not antisymmetric on .

Counterexample:

Let and  , then and .

Since , is not antisymmetric on .◻

4. is transitive on .

Proof:

Let s.t , and s.t. .

There are two cases to be examined:

Case 1: and .

Since , thus .

Case 2: and .

Since , thus .

Since in both possible cases is transitive on .◻

 

5. Since is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive, it is an equivalence relation. Equivalence classes are and .

Let , then

.

Case 1: , then .

.

.

Case 2: , then .

.

.

Note that this is a partition since or . So all the intersections are empty.

.

Further, we have . Note that is excluded from .

Example \(\PageIndex{22}\)

Let \(S = M_{22}(\mathbb{C})\). Define \(A R B \iff \det(A) = \det(B),\) for \(A, B \in S\). Prove \(R\) is an equivalence relation and identify \([I_2]_R\).

Solution

Reflexive:
Given  \(S = M_{22}(\mathbb{C})\), and \(A R B \iff \det(A) = \det(B),\) for \(A, B \in S\).
  Let \(A \in S\).  We shall show that \(A R A\).
   Since \(\det(A) = \det(A)\), \(A R A\).
    Thus \(R\) is reflexive.
Symmetry: Let \(A,B \in M_{22}(\mathbb{C}) \) such that \(A R B\). We shall show that \(B R A\).

Since \(A R B\), \(\det(A) = \det(B)\).
    Thus \(\det(B) = \det(A).\) Hence \(B R A\).
  Thus \(R\) is symmetric.
Transitive:
   Let \(A,B,C \in M_{22}(\mathbb{C}) \) such that \(A R B\) and \(B R C\). Show We shall show that \(A R C\).
 Since \(A R B\) and \(B R C\),  \(\det(A) = \det(B)= \det(C).\) Thus \( \det(A) = \det(C)\).
  Thus, \(R\) is transitive.

Since \(R\) is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive, \(R\) is an equivalence relation on  \(S\).
Equivalence Class \([I_2]_R\):
\[
[I_2]_R = \{A \in M_{22}(\mathbb{C}) \mid \det(A) = \det(I_2) = 1\} = SL_2(\mathbb{C})
\]
 

 

Recall:

Let \(m,n \in \mathbb{Z}\).

We say that \(m\) divides \(n\) (written as \(m|n\)) if \(n=mk\) for some \(k\in \mathbb{Z}\).

Congruence Modulo \(n\) 

 

Example \(\PageIndex{23}\)

Let \(S= \mathbb{Z}, n\in \mathbb{Z}_+\).  Define \(aRb\) if and only if \(n|(a-b), \forall a,b \in \mathbb{Z}\).

Note that \(n\) is a positive integer.

Let \(n=3\).  Choose \(a=1\) and \(b=2\).

Are 1 and 2 related? i.e. does \(3|1-2\)?  Does \(1-2=3k, k\in \mathbb{Z}\)?  Since there is no integer \( k\) s.t. \(-1 = 3k\), ∴ \(1 \) is not related to \( 2\).

 

However, we can see that we have three groups, as shown in the image below:

 

 

 

Definition: Modulo

Let \(n\) \(\in\) \(\mathbb{Z_+}\).

\(a\) is congruent to \(b\) modulo \(m\) denoted as \( a \equiv b (mod \, n) \), if \(a\) and \(b\)  have the remainder when they are divided by \(n\), for  \(a, b \in \mathbb{Z}\).

Properties

Let \(n \in \mathbb{Z_+}\). Then

 

Theorem \(\PageIndex{3}\)

Two integers \(a \) and \(b\) are said to be congruent modulo \( n\), \(a \equiv b (mod \, n)\), if all of the following are true:

a) \(m\mid (a-b).\)

b) both \(a\) and \(b \) have the same remainder when divided by \(n.\)

c) \(a-b= kn\), for some \(k \in \mathbb{Z}\).

NOTE: Possible remainders of \( n\) are \(0, ..., n-1.\)

Reflexive Property

Theorem \(\PageIndex{4}\)

The relation " \(\equiv\) " over \(\mathbb{Z}\) is reflexive.

Proof: Let \(a \in \mathbb{Z} \).

Then \(a-a=0(n)\), and \( 0 \in \mathbb{Z}\).

Hence \(a \equiv a (mod \, n)\).

Thus congruence modulo n is Reflexive.

Symmetric Property

Theorem \(\PageIndex{5}\)

The relation " \(\equiv\) " over \(\mathbb{Z}\) is symmetric.

Proof: Let \(a, b \in \mathbb{Z} \) such that \(a \equiv b\) (mod n).

Then \(a-b=kn, \) for some \(k \in \mathbb{Z}\).

Now \( b-a= (-k)n \) and \(-k \in \mathbb{Z}\).

Hence \(b \equiv a(mod \, n)\).

Thus the relation is symmetric.

Antisymmetric Property

Is the relation " \(\equiv\) " over \(\mathbb{Z}\) antisymmetric?

Counterexample: \(n=2\) is fixed

choose: \(a= 3, b= 5\), then

\(a \equiv b(mod \, n)\) and \( b \equiv a (mod \, n)\)

but \( a \ne b.\)

Thus the relation " \(\equiv\) "on \(\mathbb{Z}\) is not antisymmetric.

Transitive Property

Theorem \(\PageIndex{6}\)

The relation " \(\equiv\) " over \(\mathbb{Z}\) is transitive.

Proof: Let \(a, b, c \in\) \(\mathbb{Z}\), such that \(a \equiv b (mod n)\) and \(b \equiv c (mod n).\)

Then \(a=b+kn, k \in\) \(\mathbb{Z}\) and \(b=c+hn, h \in\) \(\mathbb{Z}\).

We shall show that \(a \equiv c (mod \, n)\).

Consider \(a=b+kn=(c+hn)+kn=c+(hn+kn)=c+(h+k)n, h+k \in\) \(\mathbb{Z}\).

Hence \(a \equiv c (mod \, n)\).

Thus congruence modulo \(n\) is transitive.

Theorem \(\PageIndex{7}\)

The relation " \(\equiv\) " over \(\mathbb{Z}\) is an equivalence relation.

Modulo classes

Let  \(n\in \mathbb{Z}_+\).The relation \( \equiv \) on  \(\ mathbb {Z} \) by \( a \equiv b \) if and only if \(m \mid (a-b)\)\is an equivalence relation. The classes of \(pmod n\) have the following equivalence classes: \(\{[0], [1], \cdots, [(n-1)]\}\).

Example of writing equivalence classes:

Example \(\PageIndex{24}\):

The equivalence classes for \(( mod \, 3 )\) are (need to show steps):

.

.

.

 Modulo Arithmetic

In this section, we will explore arithmetic operations in a modulo world.

Let \( n \in \mathbb{Z_+}\).

Theorem \(\PageIndex{8}\)

Let \( a, b, c,d, \in \mathbb{Z}\) such that \(a \equiv b (mod\,n) \) and \(c \equiv d (mod\, n). \) Then \((a+c) \equiv (b+d)(mod\, n).\)

Proof:

Let \(a, b, c, d \in\mathbb{Z}\), such that \(a \equiv b (mod\, n) \) and \(c \equiv d (mod \,n). \)

We shall show that \( (a+c) \equiv (b+d) (mod\, n).\)

Since \(a \equiv b (mod\, n) \) and \(c \equiv d (mod\, n), n \mid (a-b)\) and \(n \mid (c-d)\)

Thus \( a= b+nk, \) and \(c= d+nl,\) for \(k \) and \( l \in \mathbb{Z}\).

Consider\( (a+c) -( b+d)= a-b+c-d=n(k+l), k+l \in \mathbb{Z}\).

Hence \((a+c)\equiv (b+d) (mod \,n).\Box\)

Theorem \(\PageIndex{9}\)

 

Let \( a, b, c,d, \in \mathbb{Z}\) such that \(a \equiv b (mod \, n) \) and \(c \equiv d (mod \,n). \) Then \((ac) \equiv (bd) (mod \,n).\)

Proof:

Let \(a, b, c, d \in \mathbb{Z}\), such that \(a \equiv b (mod\, n) \) and \(c \equiv d (mod \, n). \)

We shall show that \( (ac) \equiv (bd) (mod\, n).\)

Since \(a \equiv b (mod \,n) \) and \(c \equiv d (mod\, n), n \mid (a-b)\) and \(n \mid (c-d)\)

Thus \( a= b+nk, \) and \(c= d+nl,\) for \(k\) and \( l \in \mathbb{Z}\).

Consider \( (ac) -( bd)= ( b+nk) ( d+nl)-bd= bnl+dnk+n^2lk=n (bl+dk+nlk), \) where \((bl+dk+nlk) \in \mathbb{Z}\).

Hence \((ac) \equiv (bd) (mod \,n).\Box\)

Theorem \(\PageIndex{10}\)

Let \(a, b \in\) \(\mathbb{Z}\) such that \(a \equiv b (mod \, n) \). Then \(a^2 \equiv b^2 (mod \, n).\)

Proof:

Let \(a, b \in\) \(\mathbb{Z}\), and n \(\in\) \(\mathbb{Z_+}\), such that \(a \equiv b (mod \, n).\)

We shall show that \(a^2 \equiv b^2 (mod \, n).\)

Since \( a \equiv b (mod \, n), n\mid (a-b).\)

Thus \( (a-b)= nx,\) where \(x \in\) \(\mathbb{Z}\).

Consider \((a^2 - b^2) = (a+b)(a-b)=(a+b)(nx), = n(ax+bx), ax+bx \in \mathbb{Z}\).

Hence \(n \mid a^2 - b^2,\) therefore \(a^2 \equiv b^2 (mod \, n).\) \(\Box\)

Theorem \(\PageIndex{11}\)

Let \(a, b \in\) \(\mathbb{Z}\) such that \(a \equiv b (mod \, n)\). Then \(a^m \equiv b^m (mod \, n)\), \(\forall  m \in\) \(\mathbb{Z}_+\).

Proof:

Exercise.

By using the above result, we can solve many problems. Some of them are discussed below: 

Example \(\PageIndex{25}\): \( mod\, 3\) Arithmetic

Let \(n = 3\).

Addition

+	[0]	[1]	[2]
[0]	[0]	[1]	[2]
[1]	[1]	[2]	[0]
[2]	[2]	[0]	[1]

Multiplication

x	[0]	[1]	[2]
[0]	[0]	[0]	[0]
[1]	[0]	[1]	[2]
[2]	[0]	[2]	[1]

Example \(\PageIndex{26}\): \( mod\, 4\) Arithmetic

Let \(n=4\).

x	[0]	[1]	[2]	[3]
[0]	[0]	[0]	[0]	[0]
[1]	[0]	[1]	[2]	[3]
[2]	[0]	[2]	[0]	[2]
[3]	[0]	[3]	[2]	[1]

Example \(\PageIndex{27}\):

Find the remainder when \((101)(103)(107)(109)\) is divided by \( 11.\)

Answer

\(101 \equiv 2 (mod \, 11)\)

\(103 \equiv 4 (mod \, 11)\)

\(107 \equiv 8 (mod \, 11)\)

\(109 \equiv 10 (mod \,11)\).

Therefore,

\((101)(103)(107)(109) \equiv (2)(4)(8)(10) (mod \,11) \equiv 2 (mod \,11)\).

Example \(\PageIndex{28}\):

Find the remainder when\( 7^{1453}\) is divided by \( 8.\)

Answer

\(7^0 \equiv 1 (mod \, 8)\)

\(7^1 \equiv 7 (mod \, 8)\)

\(7^2 \equiv 1 (mod \, 8)\)

\(7^3 \equiv 7 (mod \, 8)\),

As there is a consistent pattern emerging and we know that \(1453\) is odd, then \(7^{1453} \equiv 7 (mod \, 8)\). Thus the remainder is \(7.\)

Example \(\PageIndex{29}\):

Find the remainder when \(7^{2020}\) is divided by \(18.\)

Answer

\(7^0 \equiv 1 (mod \, 18)\)

\(7^1 \equiv 7 (mod \, 18)\)

\(7^2 \equiv 13 (mod \, 18)\)

\(7^3 \equiv 1 (mod \, 18)\),

As there is a consistent pattern emerging and we know that \(2020=(673)3+1\), \(7^{2020}= 7^{(673)3+1}=\left( 7^3\right)^{673}7^1 \equiv 7 (mod \, 18).\) Thus the remainder is \(7.\)

Example \(\PageIndex{30}\):

Find the remainder when \( 26^{1453} \) is divided by \( 3.\)

Caution

Throughout this text, we identify \(\mathbb{Z}_n\) with \(\{0, 1,\ldots, (n-1)\}\), using these representatives instead of the residue classes \(\{[0]_n,  [1]_n,\ldots, [n-1]_n\}\) or \(\{[0], [1],\ldots, [n-1]\}\).