1.2: Exponents and Cancellation
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
Definition: Inverse
Let S be a set with a binary operation ⋆, and with identity e. Let a∈S, then b∈S is called an inverse of a if a⋆b=b⋆a=e.
Example 1.2.1:
- For every a∈Z, −a is the inverse of a with the operation +.
- For every a∈R∖{0}, a−1=1a is the inverse of a with the multiplication.
Cancellation law
Let S be a set with a binary operation ⋆. If for any a,b,c∈S, a⋆b=a⋆c then b=c
Example 1.2.2:
(1)(0)=(3)(0)=0, but 1≠3.
Example 1.2.3:
- For any a,b,c∈Z, a+b=a+c then b=c.
- For any a,b,c∈Z and a≠0, ab=ac then b=c.
Example 1.2.4:
If ab=0 then a=0 or b=0.
Theorem 1.2.1
For any integers a, and b, the following are true.
1. −(−a)=a.
2. 0(a)=0.
3. (−a)b=−ab.
4. (−a)(−b)=ab.
- Proof
-
1. Let a∈Z. Since −a is the inverse of a, a+(−a)=(−a)+a=0. Therefore the additive inverse of −a is a.
Thus −(−a)=a.
2. Let a∈Z. Then by distributive law, 0a+0a=(0+0)a=0a=0a+0. Now by cancelations law, 0a=0.
3. Let a,b∈Z. By distributive law, ((−a)+a)b=(−a)b+ab. Since −a is the additive inverse of a, (−a)+a=0. By (2), 0=(−a)b+ab. Thus (−a)b is the additive inverse of ab. Hence −ab=(−a)b.
4. Let a,b∈Z. Since (−a)(−b)+(−a)b=(−a)(−b+b)=(−a)(0)=0. Hence (−a)(−b) is the additive inverse of (−a)b. But ab is the additive inverse of −ab. Thus by (3), we have (−a)(−b)=ab..
Definition: Exponentiation
For every a,n∈Z+, the binary operation exponentiation is denoted as an, defined as n copies of a.
Example 1.2.5:
23=8
Example 1.2.6:
- Determine whether the exponentiation is associative?
- Determine whether the exponentiation is commutative?
Solution
- Since (32)3=93 is not the same as 323=38, the exponentiation is not associative.
- Since 32=9 is not the same as 23=8, the exponentiation is not commutative.
Theorem 1.2.2
The exponentiation is distributive over multiplication. That is (ab)n=anbn,∀a,b,n∈Z.
- Proof
-
Since multiplication is associative, the result follows.
Example 1.2.7:
Prove that aman=am+n,∀a,m,n∈Z.
Example 1.2.8:
Prove that (am)n=amn,∀a,m,n∈Z.