8.4: Boundary Issues and Abel’s Theorem
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
- Explain the Abel's theorem
Summarizing our results, we see that any power series
for
for
for
Thus power series are very well behaved within their interval of convergence, and our cavalier approach from Chapter 2 is justified, EXCEPT for one issue. If you go back to Exercise Q1 of Chapter 2, you see that we used the geometric series to obtain the series,
We substituted
The fact is that for a power series
They are all related in that we started with the geometric series and integrated twice, thus they all have radius of convergence equal to
Even with the unpredictability of a power series at the endpoints of its interval of convergence, the Weierstrass-M test does give us some hope of uniform convergence.
Suppose the power series
- Hint
-
For
, .
Unfortunately, this result doesn’t apply to the integrals we mentioned as the convergence at the endpoints is not absolute. Nonetheless, the integrations we performed in Chapter 2 are still legitimate. This is due to the following theorem by Abel which extends uniform convergence to the endpoints of the interval of convergence even if the convergence at an endpoint is only conditional. Abel did not use the term uniform convergence, as it hadn’t been defined yet, but the ideas involved are his.
Suppose the power series
The proof of this is not intuitive, but involves a clever technique known as Abel’s Partial Summation Formula.
Let
Prove Lemma
- Hint
-
For
, .
Let
Prove Lemma
Prove Theorem
- Hint
-
Let
. Since converges then by the Cauchy Criterion, there exists such that if then . Let . By Lemma ,Thus for
, ,
Suppose the power series
Prove Corollary
- Hint
-
Consider
.


