7.4: Properties of Integrals
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
If f:D→R and g:D→R, then
sup{f(x)+g(x):x∈D}≤sup{f(x):x∈D}+sup{g(x):x∈D}
and
inf{f(x)+g(x):x∈D}≥inf{f(x):x∈D}+inf{g(x):x∈D}
Prove the previous proposition.
Find examples for which the inequalities in the previous proposition are strict.
Suppose f and g are both integrable on [a,b]. Then f+g is integrable on [a,b] and
∫ba(f+g)=∫baf+∫bag.
- Proof
-
Given ϵ>0, let P1 and P2 be partitions of [a,b] with
U(f,P1)−L(f,P1)<ϵ2
and
U(g,P2)−L(g,P2)<ϵ2.
Let P=P1∪P2. By the previous proposition,
U(f+g,P)≤U(f,P)+U(g,P)
and
L(f+g,P)≥L(f,P)+L(g,P).
Hence
U(f+g,P)−L(f+g,P)≤(U(f,P)+U(g,P))−(L(f,P)+L(g,P))=(U(f,P)−L(f,P))+(U(g,P)−L(g,P))≤(U(f,P1)−L(f,P1))+(U(g,P2)−L(g,2P))<ϵ2+ϵ2=ϵ.
Hence f+g is integrable on [a,b].
Moreover,
∫ba(f+g)≤U(f+g,P)≤U(f,P)+U(g,P)≤(∫baf+ϵ2)+(∫bag+ϵ2)=∫baf+∫bag+ϵ
and
∫ba(f+g)≥L(f+g,P)≥L(f,P)+L(g,P)≥(∫baf−ϵ2)+(∫bag−ϵ2)=∫baf+∫bag−ϵ.
Since ϵ>0 was arbitrary, it follows that
∫ba(f+g)=∫baf+∫bag.
Q.E.D.
Suppose a<b and f:[a,b]→R and g:[a,b]→R are both bounded. Show that
¯∫ba(f+g)≤¯∫baf+¯∫bag.
Find an example for which the inequality is strict.
Find an example to show that f+g may be integrable on [a,b] even though neither f nor g is integrable on [a,b].
If f is integrable on [a,b] and α∈R, then αf is integrable on [a,b] and
∫baαf=α∫baf.
Prove the previous proposition.
Suppose a<b,f:[a,b]→R is bounded, and c∈(a,b). Then f is integrable on [a,b] if and only if f is integrable on both [a,c] and [c,b].
- Proof
-
Suppose f is integrable on [a,b]. Given ϵ>0, let Q be a partition of [a,b] such that
U(f,Q)−L(f,Q)<ϵ.
Let P=Q∪{c},P1=P∩[a,c], and P2=P∩[c,b]. Then
(U(f,P1)−L(f,P1))+(U(f,P2)−L(f,P2))=(U(f,P1)+U(f,P2))−(L(f,P1)+L(f,P2))=U(f,P)−L(f,P)≤U(f,Q)−L(f,Q)<ϵ.
Thus we must have both
U(f,P1)−L(f,P1)<ϵ
and
U(f,P2)−L(f,P2)<ϵ.
Hence f is integrable on both [a,c] and [c,b].
Now suppose f is integrable on both [a,c] and [c,b]. Given ϵ>0, let P1 and P2 be partitions of [a,c] and [c,b], respectively, such that
U(f,P1)−L(f,P1)<ϵ2
and
U(f,P2)−L(f,P2)<ϵ2.
Let P=P1∪P2. Then P is a partition of [a,b] and
U(f,P)−L(f,P)=(U(f,P1)+U(f,P2))−(L(f,P1)+L(f,P2))=(U(f,P1)−L(f,P1))+(U(f,P2)−L(f,P2))<ϵ2+ϵ2=ϵ.
Thus f is integrable on [a,b]. Q.E.D.
Suppose f is integrable on [a,b] and c∈(a,b). Then
∫baf=∫caf+∫bcf.
- Proof
-
If P and Q are partitions of [a,c] and [c,b], respectively, then
U(f,P)+U(f,Q)=U(f,P∪Q)≥∫baf.
Thus
U(f,P)≥∫baf−U(f,Q),
so
∫caf=¯∫caf≥∫baf−U(f,Q).
Hence
U(f,Q)≥∫baf−∫caf,
so
∫bcf=¯∫bcf≥∫baf−∫caf.
Thus
∫caf+∫bcf≥∫baf.
Similarly, if P and Q are partitions of [a,c] and [c,b], respectively, then
L(f,P)+L(f,Q)=L(f,P∪Q)≤∫baf.
Thus
L(f,P)≤∫baf−L(f,Q),
so
∫caf=∫ca_f≤∫baf−L(f,Q).
Hence
L(f,Q)≤∫baf−∫caf,
so
∫bcf=∫bc_f≤∫baf−∫caf.
Thus
∫caf+∫bcf≤∫baf.
Hence
∫caf+∫bcf=∫baf.
Q.E.D.
Suppose f:[a,b]→R is bounded and B is a finite subset of (a,b). Show that if f is continuous on [a,b]∖B, then f is integrable on [a,b].
If f is integrable on [a,b] with f(x)≥0 for all x∈[a,b], then
∫baf≥0.
- Proof
-
The result follows from the fact that L(f,P)≥0 for any partition P of [a,b]. Q.E.D.
Suppose f and g are both integrable on [a,b]. If, for all x∈[a,b],f(x)≤g(x), then
∫baf≤∫bag.
- Proof
-
Since g(x)−f(x)≥0 for all x∈[a,b], we have, using Propositions 7.4.2, 7.4.3, and 7.4.6,
∫bag−∫baf=∫ba(g−f)≥0.
Q.E.D.
Suppose f is integrable on [a,b],m∈R,M∈R, and m≤f(x)≤M for all x∈[a,b]. Then
m(b−a)≤∫baf≤M(b−a).
- Proof
-
It follows from the previous proposition that
m(b−a)=∫bamdx≤∫baf(x)dx≤∫baMdx=M(b−a).
Q.E.D.
Show that
1≤∫1−111+x2dx≤2.
Suppose f is continuous on [0,1], differentiable on (0,1), f(0)=0, and |f′(x)|≤1 for all x∈(0,1). Show that
−12≤∫10f≤12.
Suppose f is integrable on [a,b] and define F:(a,b)→R by
F(x)=∫xaf.
Show that there exists α∈R such that for any x,y∈(a,b) with x<y,
|F(y)−F(x)|≤α(y−x).
Suppose g is integrable on [a,b],g([a,b])⊂[c,d], and f:[c,d]→R is continuous. If h=f∘g, then h is integrable on [a,b].
- Proof
-
Let ϵ>0 be given. Let
K>sup{f(x):x∈[c,d]}−inf{f(x):x∈[c,d]}
and choose δ>0 so that δ<ϵ and
|f(x)−f(y)|<ϵ2(b−a)
whenever |x−y|<δ. Let P={x0,x1,…,xn} be a partition of [a,b] such that
U(g,P)−L(g,P)<δ22K.
For i=1,2,…,n, let
mi=inf{g(x):xi−1≤x≤xi},
Mi=sup{g(x):xi−1≤x≤xi},
wi=inf{h(x):xi−1≤x≤xi},
and
Wi=sup{h(x):xi−1≤x≤xi}.
Finally, let
I={i:i∈Z,1≤i≤n,Mi−mi<δ}
and
J={i:i∈Z,1≤i≤n,Mi−mi≥δ}.
Note that
δ∑i∈J(xi−xi−1)≤∑i∈J(Mi−mi)(xi−xi−1)≤n∑i=1(Mi−mi)(xi−xi−1)<δ22K,
from which it follows that
∑i∈J(xi−xi−1)<δ2K.
Then
U(h,P)−L(h,P)=∑i∈I(Wi−wi)(xi−xi−1)+∑i∈J(Wi−wi)(xi−xi−1)<ϵ2(b−a)∑i∈I(xi−xi−1)+K∑i∈J(xi−xi−1)<ϵ2+δ2<ϵ2+ϵ2=ϵ.
Thus h is integrable on [a,b]. Q.E.D.
Suppose f and g are both integrable on [a,b]. Then fg is integrable on [a,b].
- Proof
-
Since f and g are both integrable, both f+g and f−g are integrable. Hence, by the previous proposition, both (f+g)2 and (f−g)2 are integrable. Thus
14((f+g)2−(f−g)2))=fg
is integrable on [a,b]. Q.E.D.
Suppose f is integrable on [a,b]. Then |f| is integrable on [a,b] and
|∫baf|≤∫ba|f|.
- Proof
-
The integrability of |f| follows from the integrability of f, the continuity of g(x)=|x|, and Proposition 7.4.9. For the inequality, note that
−|f(x)|≤f(x)≤|f(x)|
for all x∈[a,b]. Hence
−∫ba|f|≤∫baf≤∫ba|f|,
from which the result follows. Q.E.D.
Either prove the following statement or show it is false by finding a counterexample: If f:[0,1]→R is bounded and f2 is integrable on [0,1], then f is integrable on [0,1].
7.4.1 Extended definitions
If f integrable on [a,b], then we define
∫abf=−∫baf.
Moreover, if f is a function defined at a point a∈R, we define
∫aaf=0.
Suppose f is integrable on a closed interval containing the
points a,b, and c. Show that
∫baf=∫caf+∫bcf.