3.2: Limit Theorems
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
Here we state and prove various theorems that facilitate the computation of general limits.
Let
for
for
Let
Then
, , , provided that .
Let us first prove (a). Let
It follows from Theorem 2.2.1 that
Applying Theorem 3.1.2 again, we get
Let us now show that if
This implies
Then
Consider
Solution
Then, combining all parts of Theorem 3.2.1, we get
We proceed in the same way to compute the following limit.
Solution
We now consider
Solution
Since the limit of the denominator
Therefore,
Let
- Proof
-
Suppose
. Given , there exists such that whenever andThus, for
with and , we haveLet us prove the converse. Fix a sequence
in such with and for every . Given , there exists such that whenever and ,Then there exists
satisfying for allThis implies
for allThus,
is a Cauchy sequence, and hence there exists such thatWe now prove that
has limit at using Theorem 3.1.2. Let be a sequence in such that and for every . By the previous argument, there exists such thatFix any
and let satisfy (3.3). There exists such that andfor all
. Then for such . Letting , we have . Thus, since is arbitrary. It now follows from Theorem 3.1.2 that .
The rest of this section discussed some special limits and their properties.
Let
Given a subset
It follows from the definition that
(One-sided limits) Let
if for every
We say that
Consider the function
Solution
Let
Similarly, for
Consider the function
Solution
We have
and
The following theorem follows directly from the definition of one-sided limits.
Let
if and only if
- Proof
-
Add proof here and it will automatically be hidden
It follows from Example 3.2.4 that
Solution
Add text here.
(monotonicity) Let
- We say that
is increasing on if, for all , implies . - We say that
is decreasing on if, for all , implies .
If
Suppose
- Proof
-
Since
for all , the setis nonempty and bounded above. Thus,
is a real number. We will show that
. For any , by the definition of the least upper bound, there exists such thatLet
. Using the increasing monotonicity, we getTherefore,
. The rest of the proof of the theorem is similar.
Let
(infinite limits) Let
if for every
Similarly, we write
if for every
Infinite limits of functions have similar properties to those of sequences from Chapter 2 (see Definition 2.3.2 and Theorem 2.3.6).
We show that
Solution
Let
Now, choose
as desired.
(limits at infinity) Let
if for every
Let
if for every
We can also define
in a similar way.
We prove form the definition that
Solution
The approach is similar to that for sequences, with the difference that
Let
for all
Now,
Therefore, simplifying, 3.5 is equivalent to
We first restrict
Exercise
Find the following limits:
,
- Answer
-
Add texts here. Do not delete this text first.
Exercise
Let
- Answer
-
Add texts here. Do not delete this text first.
Exercise
Find the following limits:
, , , .
- Answer
-
Add texts here. Do not delete this text first.
Exercise
Find the following limits:
. .
- Answer
-
Add texts here. Do not delete this text first.
Exercise
Let
where
- Answer
-
Add texts here. Do not delete this text first.
Exercise
Determine the one-sided limits
- Answer
-
Add texts here. Do not delete this text first.
Exercise
Find each of the following limits if they exist:
. . .
- Answer
-
Add texts here. Do not delete this text first.
Exercise
For
Find the value of
- Answer
-
Add texts here. Do not delete this text first.
Exercise
Determine all values of
- Answer
-
Add texts here. Do not delete this text first.
Exercise
Let
- If
is bounded above, then exists and is a real number. - If
is not bounded above, then .
State and prove analogous reasults in case
- Answer
-
Add texts here. Do not delete this text first.


