10.6: Angles after inversion
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
In the inversive plane, the inverse of an arc is an arc.
- Proof
-
Consider four distinct points A,B,C, and D; let A′,B′,C′, and D′ be their inverses. We need to show that D lies on the arc ABC if and only if D′ lies on the arc A′B′C′. According to Proposition 9.5.1, the latter is equivalent to the following:
∡ADC=∡ABC⇔∡A′D′C′=∡A′B′C′.
The latter follows from Theorem 10.2.1b.
The following theorem states that the angle between arcs changes only its sign after the inversion.
Let AB1C1, AB2C2 be two arcs in the inversive plane, and the arcs A′B′1C′1, A′B′2C′2 be their inverses. Let [AX1) and [AX2) be the half-lines tangent to AB1C1 and AB2C2 at A, and [A′Y1) and [A′Y2) be the half-lines tangent to A′B′1C′1 and A′B′2C′2 at A′. Then
∡X1AX2≡−∡Y1A′Y2.
- Proof
-
Applying to Proposition 9.6.1,
∡X1AX2≡∡X1AC1+∡C1AC2+∡C2AX2≡≡(π−∡C1B1A)+∡C1AC2+(π−∡AB2C2)≡≡−(∡C1B1A+∡AB2C2+∡C2AC1)≡≡−(∡C1B1A+∡AB2C1)−(∡C1B2C2+∡C2AC1).
The same way we get that
∡Y1A′Y2≡−(∡C′1B′1A′+∡A′B′2C′1)−(∡C′1B′2C′2+∡C′2A′C′1).
By Theorem 10.2.1b,
∡C1B1A+∡AB2C1≡−(∡C′1B′1A′+∡A′B′2C′1),∡C1B2C2+∡C2AC1≡−(∡C′1B′2C′2+∡C′2A′C′1).
and hence the result.
The angle between arcs can be defined as the angle between its tangent half-lines at the common endpoint. Therefore under inversion, the angles between arcs are preserved up to sign.
From Exercise 5.7.4, it follows that the angle between arcs with common endpoint A is the limit of ∡P1AP2 where P1 and P2 are points approaching A along the corresponding arcs. This observation can be used to define the angle between a pair of curves emerging from one point. It turns out that under inversion, angles between curves are also preserved up to sign.
Let P be the inverse of point Q in a circle Γ. Assume that P′, Q′, and Γ′ are the inverses of P,Q, and Γ in another circle Ω. Then P′ is the inverse of Q′ in Γ′.
- Proof
-
If P=Q, then P′=Q′∈Γ′. Therefore, P′ is the inverse of Q′ in Γ′.
It remains to consider the case P≠Q. Let Δ2 and Δ2 be two distinct circles that intersect at P and Q. According to Corollary 10.5.2, Δ1⊥Γ and Δ2⊥Γ.
Let Δ′1 and Δ′2 denote the inverses of Δ1 and Δ2 in Omega. Clearly, Δ′1 meets Δ′2 at P′ and Q′.
By Theorem 10.6.1, Δ′1⊥Γ′ and Δ′2⊥Γ′. By Corollary 10.5.1, P′ is the inverse of Q′ in Γ′.