Let and be measure spaces, with and Let be the family of all "rectangles," i.e., sets
with and .
Define a premeasure by
Let be the -induced outer measure in and
the -induced measure ("product measure," ) on the -field of all -measurable sets in (Chapter 7, §§5-6).
We consider functions (extended-real).
I. We begin with some definitions.
Definitions
(1) Given a function (of two variables ), let or denote the function on given by
it arises from by fixing .
Similarly, or is given by .
(2) Define by
and set
also written
This is called the iterated integral of on and in this order.
Similarly,
and
Note that by the rules of §5, these integrals are always defined.
(3) With as above, we say that is a Fubini map or has the Fubini properties (after the mathematician Fubini) iff
(a) is -measurable on and is -measurable on ;
(b) is -measurable on for almost all (i.e., for , is -measurable on for and
(c) the iterated integrals above satisfy
(the main point).
For monotone sequences
we now obtain the following lemma.
Lemma
If (pointwise) on and if each has Fubini property (a), (b), or (c), then has the same property.
Proof
For set
and
By assumpsion,
pointwise on Thus by Theorem 4 in §6,
i.e., (pointwise) on with as in Definition 2.
Again, by Theorem 4 of §6,
or by Definition 2,
Similarly for
and
Hence satisfies (c) if all do.
Next, let have property (b); so is -measurable on if (). Let
so and all are -measurable on for Hence so is
Similarly for Thus satisfies (b).
Property (a) follows from and
Using Problems 9 and 10 from §6, the reader will also easily verify the following lemma.
Lemma
(i) If and are nonnegative, -measurable Fubini maps, so is for .
(ii) If, in addition,
then is a Fubini map, too
Lemma
Let (pointwise), with on .
(i) If all are -measurable Fubini maps, so is .
(ii) If the have Fubini properties (a) and (b), then
and
II. By Theorem 4 of Chapter 7, §3, the family (see above) is a semiring, being the product of two rings,
(Verify!) Thus using Theorem 2 in Chapter 7, §6, we now show that is an extension of
Theorem
The product premeasure s is -additive on the semiring Hence
(i) and on and
(ii) the characteristic function of any set is a Fubini map.
Proof
Let so
(Why?) Thus for a fixed is just a multiple of the -simple map hence -measurable on Also,
so is -simple on with
Similarly for and
Thus has Fubini properties (a) and (b), and for every
To prove -additivity, let
so
(Why?) As shown above, each has Fubini properties (a) and (b); so by (1) and Lemma 3,
as required.
Assertion (i) now follows by Theorem 2 in Chapter 7, §6. Hence
so by formula (1), also has Fubini property (c), and all is proved.
Next, let be the -ring generated by the semiring (so ).
Lemma
is the least set family such that
(i) ;
(ii) is closed under countable disjoint unions; and
(iii) if and .
This is simply Theorem 3 in Chapter 7, §3, with changed notation.
Lemma
If (-generated by then is a Fubini map.
Proof
Let be the family of all such that is a Fubini map. We shall show that satisfies (i)-(iii) of Lemma 4, and so
(ii) Let
Then
and each is a Fubini map. Hence so is by Lemma 3. Thus , proving (ii).
(iii) We must show that is a Fubini map if is and if Now, implies
(Why?) Also, by Theorem 1, implies
and is a Fubini map. So is by assumption. So also is
by Lemma 2(ii). Thus proving (iii).
By Lemma 4, then, Hence is a Fubini map.
We can now establish one of the main theorems, due to Fubini.
Theorem (Fubini I)
Suppose is -measurable on ( as above) rom. Then is a Fubini map if either
(i) on or
(ii) one of
is finite.
In both cases,
Proof
First, let
i.e., is -elementary, hence certainly -measurable. (Why?) By Lemmas 5 and 2, each is a Fubini map. Hence so is (Lemma 3). Formula (2) is simply Fubini property (c).
Now take any -measurable By Lemma 2 in §2,
for some sequence of -elementary maps, As shown above, each is a Fubini map. Hence so is by Lemma 1. This settles case (i).
Next, assume (ii). As is -measurable, so are and (Theorem 2 in §2). As they are nonnegative, they are Fubini maps by case (i).
So is by Lemma 2(ii), since implies
by our assumption (ii). (The three integrals are equal, as is a Fubini map.)
Thus all is proved.
III. We now want to replace by in Lemma 5 and Theorem 2. This works only under certain -finiteness conditions, as shown below.
Lemma
Let be -finite, i.e.,
for some with
Then there is such that and .
Proof
As is a -ring containing it also contains Thus by Theorem 3 of Chapter 7, §5, is -regular.
For the rest, proceed as in Theorems 1 and 2 in Chapter 7, §7.
Lemma
If is -finite (Lemma 6), then is a Fubini map.
Proof
By Lemma 6,
Let so and that is, and
As is a Fubini map. Thus by Lemma 2(ii), all reduces to proving the same for
Now, as is certainly -finite; so by Lemma 6,
Again is a Fubini map; so
As we have and so
Similarly,
Thus setting
we have
Hence by Theorem 1(h) in §5, a.e. on and a.e. on So and are "almost" measurable (Definition 2 of §3); i.e., has Fubini property (a).
Similarly, one establishes (b), and (3) yields Fubini property (c), since
as required.
Theorem (Fubini II)
Suppose is -measurable on and satisfies condition (i) or (ii) of Theorem 2.
Then is a Fubini map, provided has -finite support, i.e., vanishes outside some -finite set .
Proof
First, let
with on (as above).
As on we must have so all are -finite. (Why?) Thus by Lemma 7, each is a Fubini map, and so is (Why?)
If is -measurable and nonnegative, and on we can proceed as in Theorem 2, making all vanish on Then the and are Fubini maps by what was shown above.
Finally, in case (ii), on implies
Thus and are Fubini maps by part (i) and the argument of Theorem 2.
Note 1. The -finite support is automatic if is -integrable (Corollary 1 in §5), or if or both and are -finite (see Problem 3). The condition is also redundant if is -measurable (Theorem 2; see also Problem 4).
Note 2. By induction, our definitions and Theorems 2 and 3 extend to any finite number of measure spaces
One writes
if and sets
Theorems 2 and 3 with similar assumptions then state that the order of integrations is immaterial.
Note 3. Lebesgue measure in can be treated as the product of one- dimensional measures. Similarly for product measures (but this method is less general than that described in Problems 9 and 10 of Chapter 7, §9).
IV. Theorems 2(ii) and 3(ii) hold also for functions
if Definitions 2 and 3 are modified as follows (so that they make sense for such maps): In Definition 2, set
if is -integrable on and otherwise. Similarly for In Definition 3, replace "measurable" by "integrable."
For the proof of the theorems, apply Theorems 2(i) and 3(i) to This yields
Hence if one of these integrals is finite, is -integrable on and so are its components. The result then follows on noting that is a Fubini map (in the modified sense) iff its components are. (Verify!) See also Problem 12 below.