# 11: Basics of Graph Theory

- Page ID
- 60126

\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

- 11.1: Background
- In combinatorics, what we call a graph has nothing to do with the x and y axes, and plotting. Here, a graph is the most straightforward way you could think of to model a network. A network could be a computer network, a road network, a telephone network, etc. Conceptually, any network consists of a bunch of things (let’s call them nodes) that are being connected in some fashion. To model this, we draw some points for the nodes, and we draw edges between nodes that have a direct connection.

- 11.2: Basic Definitions, Terminology, and Notation
- Now that we have an intuitive understanding of what a graph is, it is time to make a formal definition.

- 11.3: Deletion, Complete Graphs, and the Handshaking Lemma
- We’ll begin this section by introducing a basic operation that can change a graph (or a multigraph, with or without loops) into a smaller graph: deletion. Then, we will define a very important family of graphs, called complete graphs. Finally, we will introduce Euler's Handshaking Lemma.

- 11.4: Graph Isomorphisms
- There is a problem with the way we have defined Kn. A graph is supposed to consist of two sets, V and E. Unless the elements of the sets are labeled, we cannot distinguish amongst them. Which of these graphs is K2 ? They can’t both be K2 since they aren’t the same graph – can they? The answer lies in the concept of isomorphisms.

- 11.5: Summary
- This page contains the summary of the topics covered in Chapter 11.