Loading [MathJax]/extensions/mml2jax.js
Skip to main content
Library homepage
 

Text Color

Text Size

 

Margin Size

 

Font Type

Enable Dyslexic Font
Mathematics LibreTexts

Search

  • Filter Results
  • Location
  • Classification
    • Article type
    • Stage
    • Author
    • Embed Hypothes.is?
    • Cover Page
    • License
    • Show Page TOC
    • Transcluded
    • PrintOptions
    • OER program or Publisher
    • Autonumber Section Headings
    • License Version
    • Print CSS
    • Screen CSS
  • Include attachments
Searching in
About 9 results
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Combinatorics_and_Discrete_Mathematics/A_Spiral_Workbook_for_Discrete_Mathematics_(Kwong)/04%3A_Sets/4.03%3A_Unions_and_Intersections
    We can form a new set from existing sets by carrying out a set operation.
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Mathematical_Logic_and_Proof/Book%3A_Mathematical_Reasoning__Writing_and_Proof_(Sundstrom)/02%3A_Logical_Reasoning/2.02%3A_Logically_Equivalent_Statements
    Two expressions are logically equivalent provided that they have the same truth value for all possible combinations of truth values for all variables appearing in the two expressions. In this case, we...Two expressions are logically equivalent provided that they have the same truth value for all possible combinations of truth values for all variables appearing in the two expressions. In this case, we write X≡Y and say that X and Y are logically equivalent.
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Courses/SUNY_Schenectady_County_Community_College/Discrete_Structures/02%3A_Logical_Reasoning/2.02%3A_Logically_Equivalent_Statements
    Two expressions are logically equivalent provided that they have the same truth value for all possible combinations of truth values for all variables appearing in the two expressions. In this case, we...Two expressions are logically equivalent provided that they have the same truth value for all possible combinations of truth values for all variables appearing in the two expressions. In this case, we write X≡Y and say that X and Y are logically equivalent.
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Courses/SUNY_Schenectady_County_Community_College/Discrete_Structures/05%3A_Set_Theory/5.03%3A_Properties_of_Set_Operations
    This section contains many results concerning the properties of the set operations. We have already proved some of the results. Others will be proved in this section or in the exercises. The primary p...This section contains many results concerning the properties of the set operations. We have already proved some of the results. Others will be proved in this section or in the exercises. The primary purpose of this section is to have in one place many of the properties of set operations that we may use in later proofs. These results are part of what is known as the algebra of sets or as set theory.
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Courses/Mount_Royal_University/Mathematical_Reasoning/2%3A_Basic_Concepts_of_Sets/2.5%3A_Properties_of_Sets
    The following set properties are given here in preparation for the properties for addition and multiplication in arithmetic. Note the close similarity between these properties and their corresponding ...The following set properties are given here in preparation for the properties for addition and multiplication in arithmetic. Note the close similarity between these properties and their corresponding properties for addition and multiplication.
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Courses/Monroe_Community_College/MTH_220_Discrete_Math/4%3A_Sets/4.3%3A_Unions_and_Intersections
    Distributive laws: \(\begin{array}[t]{l} A \cup (B \cap C) = (A \cup B) \cap (A \cup C), \\ A \cap (B \cup C) = (A \cap B) \cup (A \cap C). \end{array}\) We need to show that \[A \cup (B \cap C) \subs...Distributive laws: \(\begin{array}[t]{l} A \cup (B \cap C) = (A \cup B) \cap (A \cup C), \\ A \cap (B \cup C) = (A \cap B) \cup (A \cap C). \end{array}\) We need to show that \[A \cup (B \cap C) \subseteq (A \cup B) \cap (A \cup C), \qquad\mbox{and}\qquad (A \cup B) \cap (A \cup C) \subseteq A \cup (B \cap C).\]
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Mathematical_Logic_and_Proof/Book%3A_Mathematical_Reasoning__Writing_and_Proof_(Sundstrom)/05%3A_Set_Theory/5.03%3A_Properties_of_Set_Operations
    This section contains many results concerning the properties of the set operations. We have already proved some of the results. Others will be proved in this section or in the exercises. The primary p...This section contains many results concerning the properties of the set operations. We have already proved some of the results. Others will be proved in this section or in the exercises. The primary purpose of this section is to have in one place many of the properties of set operations that we may use in later proofs. These results are part of what is known as the algebra of sets or as set theory.
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Courses/SUNY_Schenectady_County_Community_College/Discrete_Structures/05%3A_Set_Theory/5.05%3A_Indexed_Families_of_Sets
    In a similar manner, if \(\Lambda\) is a nonempty indexing set and \(\mathcal{A} = \{A_{\alpha}\ |\ \alpha \in \Lambda\}\) is an indexed family of sets, we can say that this indexed family of sets is ...In a similar manner, if \(\Lambda\) is a nonempty indexing set and \(\mathcal{A} = \{A_{\alpha}\ |\ \alpha \in \Lambda\}\) is an indexed family of sets, we can say that this indexed family of sets is disjoint provided that \(\bigcap_{\alpha \in \Lambda}^{} A_{\alpha} = \emptyset\).
  • https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Mathematical_Logic_and_Proof/Book%3A_Mathematical_Reasoning__Writing_and_Proof_(Sundstrom)/05%3A_Set_Theory/5.05%3A_Indexed_Families_of_Sets
    In a similar manner, if \(\Lambda\) is a nonempty indexing set and \(\mathcal{A} = \{A_{\alpha}\ |\ \alpha \in \Lambda\}\) is an indexed family of sets, we can say that this indexed family of sets is ...In a similar manner, if \(\Lambda\) is a nonempty indexing set and \(\mathcal{A} = \{A_{\alpha}\ |\ \alpha \in \Lambda\}\) is an indexed family of sets, we can say that this indexed family of sets is disjoint provided that \(\bigcap_{\alpha \in \Lambda}^{} A_{\alpha} = \emptyset\).

Support Center

How can we help?